Total spin angular momentum meaning

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the meaning and implications of total spin angular momentum in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the expressions for orbital and spin angular momentum. Participants explore the mathematical foundations and interpretations of these concepts, including their application to electrons and the nature of angular momentum in three dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of the term (l+1) in the expression for total orbital angular momentum, L² = l(l+1), and seeks clarification on its source.
  • Another participant asserts that the correct expression includes a factor of ħ², suggesting that L² = l(l+1)ħ², and emphasizes the distinction between total angular momentum (J) and its components (L and S).
  • A participant raises a question about the total spin angular momentum for electrons, specifically whether it is precessing to yield an Sz value of 1/2ħ, and whether electrons possess two intrinsic spin values.
  • One participant argues against the term "total orbital spin angular momentum," clarifying that orbital angular momentum and spin angular momentum are distinct, with specific expressions for their magnitudes and components.
  • Another participant suggests that the (l+1) term can be derived from applying the angular momentum operator to solutions of the Schrödinger equation, hinting at a deeper understanding that may apply to all types of angular momentum.
  • A later reply mentions that quantum mechanics courses often require students to perform calculations that lead to the l(l+1) result, indicating that this pattern arises from the vector nature of angular momentum in three dimensions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the terminology and interpretation of angular momentum concepts, particularly regarding the distinction between orbital and spin angular momentum. There is no consensus on the deeper meaning of the (l+1) term or the nature of total angular momentum precession.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the derivation of angular momentum expressions may depend on specific assumptions and mathematical frameworks, and that the discussion involves unresolved aspects of quantum mechanics.

galvin452
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Two questions

1) The total orbital spin angular momentum is given as L2=l(l+1). What is the source of or meaning of the (l+1).

2) Similarly for the electron the total spin angular momentum is given as S2-1/2(1/2+1) hbar2. Is the total angular momentum precessing to give sz 1/2 hbar object?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:
galvin452 said:
Two questions
2) Similarly for the electron the total spin angular momentum is given as S2-1/2(1/2+1) hbar2. Is the total angular momentum precessing to give sz 1/2 hbar object?

Or is it that the electron has two intrinsic spin values?
 
galvin452 said:
1) The total orbital spin angular momentum is given as L2=l(l+1).

There's no such thing as "total orbital spin angular momentum."

Orbital angular momentum has magnitude ##L = \sqrt{l(l+1)} \hbar##, and its component along any direction (usually we use the z-direction) is ##L_z = m_l \hbar## where ##m_l = -l \cdots +l## in steps of 1.

Spin angular momentum has magnitude ##S = \sqrt{s(s+1)} \hbar##, and its component along any direction (usually we use the z-direction) is ##S_z = m_s \hbar## where ##m_s = -s \cdots +s## in steps of 1. For e.g. an electron, s = 1/2, so ms = -1/2 or +1/2.

Total angular momentum has magnitude ##J = \sqrt{j(j+1)} \hbar##, and its component along any direction (usually we use the z-direction) is ##J_z = m_j \hbar## where ##m_j = -j \cdots +j## in steps of 1.

(Some books use different notation.)

What is the source of or meaning of the (l+1).

For orbital angular momentum, one way to get the ##l(l+1)## is to apply the (orbital) angular momentum operator to the solutions to the Schrödinger equation for e.g. the hydrogen atom. There's probably a "deeper" way to get it which applies to all three kinds of angular momentum, but someone else will have to provide it.
 
No that's pretty much it - in QM classes (here anyway) we force students to do that calculation.
The quantum number basically comes from counting the states. There are three dimensions and the surd comes from the vector sum. You actually have to crunch through the equations to see it.

One may expect that the lth L state would have L=l\hbar ... but that neglects stuff like that there are three dimensions. The x(x+1) pattern is kind-of a symmetry in angular momentum.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K