Transfinite Induction: Understanding & Examples

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hjensen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Transfinite
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Transfinite induction is a method that extends classical induction to ordinal numbers, particularly beyond the least infinite ordinal, ω (identified with \aleph_0). It is equivalent to classical induction on ω, as there are no limit ordinals smaller than ω. However, transfinite induction includes a crucial limit case for ordinals greater than ω, which is necessary to establish properties for limit ordinals. An example illustrating the difference is the statement that every ordinal greater than 0 is a successor to a unique ordinal, which holds for ordinals less than ω but fails for ω itself.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ordinal numbers, particularly ω and limit ordinals
  • Familiarity with classical induction principles
  • Knowledge of mathematical proofs and their structures
  • Basic concepts of set theory and transfinite numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the equivalence of transfinite induction and classical induction on ω
  • Explore examples of limit ordinals and their properties
  • Learn about strong induction and its relationship to transfinite induction
  • Read standard texts on set theory that cover transfinite induction, such as "Set Theory: An Introduction to Independence" by Kenneth Kunen
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, logicians, and students of set theory who are seeking to deepen their understanding of induction methods and ordinal numbers.

Hjensen
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I'm a bit confused on the subject of transfinite induction. I've read that it is equivalent to usual induction on the ordinal number ω (presumably a proof of this can be found in a standard book on the subject - any suggestions?)

Does anyone have an example of a case in which this isn't true? In other words where these two forms of induction do not coincide? I can't seem to think of one myself.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps I should clarify a few things. By ω I mean the least infinite ordinal, which is identified with \aleph_0.

The idea I have of the two notions being different relies on intuition only. If anyone has a concrete example, you would make my day. Especially if you could include a reference to a proof of the fact that transfinite induction is equivalent to regular induction on the ordinal ω
 
Transfinite induction allows you to use induction proofs over ordinals greater than \omega, ordinary induction only allows you to prove things over \omega. The key difference is that transfinite induction involves a limit case to take into account limit ordinals i.e. if the property holds for every ordinal before the limit ordinal then it must be shown that it also holds for limit ordinal.

To see why this is important consider the statement 'every ordinal greater than 0 is a successor to some unique ordinal'. This is true for ordinals less than \omega, but is not true in general, e.g. for \omega itself. However, the successor step in an induction proof will be trivially true, so to avoid 'proving' untrue things you need a limit step too for ordinals larger than \omega.

Transfinite induction is trivially equivalent to classical induction over \omega as there are no limit ordinals smaller than \omega.
 
Last edited:
Transfinite induction is very close in spirit to that of strong induction. You assume that a statement ##P(x)## is true for every ##x<a##, and then show it's true for ##x=a##. In typical induction, you are only concerned with the whole numbers, though in transfinite induction you instead look over any other ordinal. The basic mechanics of the approach is the same.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
812
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K