I Translating the harmonic oscillator

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,384
Let's say I know the position space wavefunctions of the 1d harmonic oscillator ##\psi_n(x)## corresponding to the state ##| n \rangle## are known. I want to write ##\psi_m(x + a)##, for fixed ##m = 1,2,...##, in terms of all of the ##\psi_n(x)##. I know \begin{align*}
\psi_n(x+a) = \langle x | e^{-iaP}| n \rangle &= \int \langle x | e^{-iaP} | p \rangle \langle p | n \rangle dp \\
&= \int e^{-iap} \langle x | p \rangle \bar{\psi}_n(p) dp \\
&= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int e^{i(x-a)p} \bar{\psi}_n(p) dp
\end{align*}To get it in terms of ##\psi_n(x)## we could Fourier transform, i.e. (?)
\begin{align*}
\psi_n(x+a) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \iint e^{ip(x-x')} e^{-iap} \psi_n(x') dx' dp
\end{align*}It doesn't really look helpful?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
Let's say I know the position space wavefunctions of the 1d harmonic oscillator ##\psi_n(x)## corresponding to the state ##| n \rangle## are known. I want to write ##\psi_m(x + a)##, for fixed ##m = 1,2,...##, in terms of all of the ##\psi_n(x)##. I know \begin{align*}
\psi_n(x+a) = \langle x | e^{-iaP}| n \rangle &= \int \langle x | e^{-iaP} | p \rangle \langle p | n \rangle dp \\
&= \int e^{-iap} \langle x | p \rangle \bar{\psi}_n(p) dp \\
&= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int e^{i(x-a)p} \bar{\psi}_n(p) dp
\end{align*}[/tex]
This appears to be related to the fourier shift theorem (see row 102 of the table here).

If you want \psi_n(x + a) as a linear combination of the \psi_n, then look for one. Set <br /> \psi_n(x + a) = \sum_{m} M_{nm} \psi_m(x) and take an appropriate inner product with \psi_k(x) (ideally one with repect to which the \psi_k are orthogonal) to determine the M_{nm}, <br /> \int w(x)\psi_n(x + a)\bar{\psi}_k(x)\,dx = \sum_m M_{nm} \int w(x)\psi_m(x)\bar{\psi}_k(x)\,dx.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
As you can easily see yourself, using your Fourier-decomposition method, you simply got the sign wrong in the very first exponential-operator expression, i.e., you have
$$\langle x|\exp(+\mathrm{i} \hat{p} a) \psi_n \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p \langle x | p \rangle \langle p |\exp(\mathrm{i} \hat{p} a) \psi_n \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \exp(\mathrm{i} p x) \exp(\mathrm{i} p a) \langle p |\psi_n \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \exp[\mathrm{i} p(x+a)] \langle p|\psi_n \rangle= \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p \langle x+a|p \rangle \langle p|\psi_n \rangle= \psi_n(x+a).$$
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Back
Top