I Translating the harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing the wavefunction of a 1D harmonic oscillator, ##\psi_n(x+a)##, in terms of the known wavefunctions ##\psi_n(x)##. It explores the use of the Fourier transform and the inner product method to derive a linear combination of the wavefunctions. A key point is the correction of a sign error in the exponential operator expression related to the momentum operator. The participants emphasize the importance of orthogonality in determining the coefficients of the linear combination. Overall, the conversation highlights the mathematical intricacies involved in translating the harmonic oscillator's wavefunctions.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
Let's say I know the position space wavefunctions of the 1d harmonic oscillator ##\psi_n(x)## corresponding to the state ##| n \rangle## are known. I want to write ##\psi_m(x + a)##, for fixed ##m = 1,2,...##, in terms of all of the ##\psi_n(x)##. I know \begin{align*}
\psi_n(x+a) = \langle x | e^{-iaP}| n \rangle &= \int \langle x | e^{-iaP} | p \rangle \langle p | n \rangle dp \\
&= \int e^{-iap} \langle x | p \rangle \bar{\psi}_n(p) dp \\
&= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int e^{i(x-a)p} \bar{\psi}_n(p) dp
\end{align*}To get it in terms of ##\psi_n(x)## we could Fourier transform, i.e. (?)
\begin{align*}
\psi_n(x+a) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \iint e^{ip(x-x')} e^{-iap} \psi_n(x') dx' dp
\end{align*}It doesn't really look helpful?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
Let's say I know the position space wavefunctions of the 1d harmonic oscillator ##\psi_n(x)## corresponding to the state ##| n \rangle## are known. I want to write ##\psi_m(x + a)##, for fixed ##m = 1,2,...##, in terms of all of the ##\psi_n(x)##. I know \begin{align*}
\psi_n(x+a) = \langle x | e^{-iaP}| n \rangle &= \int \langle x | e^{-iaP} | p \rangle \langle p | n \rangle dp \\
&= \int e^{-iap} \langle x | p \rangle \bar{\psi}_n(p) dp \\
&= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int e^{i(x-a)p} \bar{\psi}_n(p) dp
\end{align*}[/tex]
This appears to be related to the fourier shift theorem (see row 102 of the table here).

If you want \psi_n(x + a) as a linear combination of the \psi_n, then look for one. Set <br /> \psi_n(x + a) = \sum_{m} M_{nm} \psi_m(x) and take an appropriate inner product with \psi_k(x) (ideally one with repect to which the \psi_k are orthogonal) to determine the M_{nm}, <br /> \int w(x)\psi_n(x + a)\bar{\psi}_k(x)\,dx = \sum_m M_{nm} \int w(x)\psi_m(x)\bar{\psi}_k(x)\,dx.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
As you can easily see yourself, using your Fourier-decomposition method, you simply got the sign wrong in the very first exponential-operator expression, i.e., you have
$$\langle x|\exp(+\mathrm{i} \hat{p} a) \psi_n \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p \langle x | p \rangle \langle p |\exp(\mathrm{i} \hat{p} a) \psi_n \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \exp(\mathrm{i} p x) \exp(\mathrm{i} p a) \langle p |\psi_n \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \exp[\mathrm{i} p(x+a)] \langle p|\psi_n \rangle= \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p \langle x+a|p \rangle \langle p|\psi_n \rangle= \psi_n(x+a).$$
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K