Translation of Sartre's L'Etre et La Neant

  • Thread starter Thread starter z0rn dawg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Translation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the translation and interpretation of Sartre's "L'Etre et La Neant" (Being and Nothingness) and its relation to his existentialist philosophy, particularly in the context of analyzing "Huis Clos" (No Exit). Participants express their struggles with understanding Sartre's unique contributions to existentialism compared to other philosophers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on how Sartre's existentialism differs from other philosophers, indicating a lack of understanding of the distinctions.
  • Another participant suggests that there are significant differences in existentialist thought among philosophers and prompts for specific comparisons.
  • A participant highlights Sartre's concept of 'radical freedom' and the idea of 'acting in bad faith' as key components of his philosophy.
  • One participant shares a personal anecdote about their experience reading Sartre and expresses a sentiment that reading his works in high school is unappealing.
  • Another participant mentions their familiarity with Sartre and Camus, noting the length of "Being and Nothingness" and the challenge of engaging with it academically.
  • A clarification is made regarding the comparison of Sartre's definition of existentialism to dictionary definitions, indicating a misunderstanding in the initial inquiry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the accessibility and appeal of Sartre's works, with some finding them tedious while others appreciate their depth. There is no consensus on the specific differences between Sartre's existentialism and that of other philosophers, as the discussion remains open-ended.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not provide specific philosophers for comparison, leaving the discussion of differences in existentialist thought somewhat vague. The conversation reflects a range of personal experiences and interpretations of Sartre's work.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in existential philosophy, literary analysis of Sartre's works, or those preparing for academic discussions on existentialism may find this thread relevant.

z0rn dawg
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I just started reading a translation of Sartre's L'Etre et La Neant (Being and Nothingness). I have to read it in order to full analyse Huis Clos (No Exit) also by Sartre. It's all for a ridiculous senior paper in English (HS).

Basically, from what I've read so far in Being and Nothingness, I really don't understand where Sartre's theory of existentialism differs from other philosophers' definitions.

So can anyone help me with Sartre's belief or definition of existentialism?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


z0rn dawg said:
I really don't understand where Sartre's theory of existentialism differs from other philosophers' definitions.

Which philosophers are you comparing? There are some pretty big differences.

So can anyone help me with Sartre's belief or definition of existentialism?

If you just want quick answers, reading his "Existentialism Is a Humanism" is a much better place to start.
 


Sartre observed that we posess 'radical freedom', that is, we have many more choices availible to us then we normally consider. Sartre emphasized that not being aware of our many choices, or procrastinating a choice, would be "acting in bad faith."

My favorite part is about nothingness in-itself, which Sartre describes with a short story about a man going to meet a friend at the tavern and taking a long walk down bar and passing face after face until arriving at the last seat at the end of the bar which was empty, no friend.

I agree that reading Sartre in high school is ridiculous!
 


I read works by Sartre and Camus in HS (including Huis clos). They were boring.
 


Werg22 said:
I read works by Sartre and Camus in HS (including Huis clos). They were boring.

I've read L'Etranger (The Stanger) and Huis Clos (No Exit) both in French. I've also read The Stranger in English. I don't find it that boring, but Being and Nothingness is sooooo long.
Plus, my teacher has a degree is philosophy, so I really can't BS my way through this.

To JoeDawg, I meant Sartre's definition or belief compared to the dictionary definition. My mistake.

Thanks for the answers guys.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
11K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K