Transmission line relative amplitude question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an annular sheet connecting the inner and outer conductors of a coaxial transmission line, focusing on the calculation of the relative amplitude of a wave reflected from this resistive sheet. The context includes concepts from transmission line theory and impedance calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the impedance of the annular sheet and uses the reflection coefficient formula, but questions the validity of their result. Some participants question whether the impedance at the connection point should be treated as a parallel combination of the sheet and characteristic impedances.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring the correct interpretation of impedance in this context. Some guidance has been offered regarding the parallel combination of impedances, which seems to clarify the original poster's confusion about their calculations.

Contextual Notes

The original poster assumes that the termination by characteristic impedance absorbs all waves, which may influence their understanding of the impedance interactions at the connection point.

timhunderwood
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An annular sheet (i.e. a flattened ring) , of thickness t = 1mm and made of a material of resistivity 0.5 Ohm m connects the inner and outer conductors of an air spaced coaxial transmission line at a point on the line. A low frequency signal is fed into one end of the line and the other is terminated by its characteristic impedance. Calculate the relative amplitude of the wave reflected from the resistive sheet.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I firstly calculated the resistance/impedance of the annular sheet which i found to be:

Z(sheet)= ln(r2/r1)*p/(2*Pi*t) where r2 and r1 are radii of coaxial cable, t is thickness of sheet and p is conductivity.

I then used the formula
Reflection coefficient = (Z(sheet)-Z(characteristic))/(Z(sheet)+Z(characteristic))
from which the unknowns nicely cancel.

But this gives the wrong answer by a factor of about 1/2.

Am I missing something? I assumed that the termination by characteristic impedance completely absorbed all waves reaching end of transmission line... Is my derivation of the impedance of the annular sheet correct?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Should the impedance at that point be the parallel combination of Zs and Zc?
 
Thank you very much, this gives the right answer...

However, could you explain why?

I don't think I really understand why the impedance at that point should be considered as the parallel combination of Zc and Zs, although I recognise that the circuit looks like resistors in parallel...
 
Resistors in parallel is the correct mental picture for this problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K