Say, [tex]\psi^1,\ \psi^2[/tex] are Dirac spinors, and [tex]M[/tex] is a matrix composed of Dirac matrices. Is the following equation hold?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\bar{\psi^1}M\psi^2 = -\Big(\bar{\psi^1}M\psi^2\Big)^T[/tex]

I'm not quite sure, here is my derivation:

[tex]

\bar{\psi^1}M\psi^2 = \bar{\psi^1}_{i}M_{ij}\psi^2_j = - \psi^2_jM^T_{ji}\psi^1_i = -\Big(\psi^1_iM_{ij}\psi^2_j\Big)^T = -\Big(\psi^1M\psi^2\Big)^T

[/tex]

where the last step, i.e. the third equality is what I'm worried about. I originally think that the change of order of the third equality is totally due to the operation of transpose (superscript "T"), so there is no need to change sign in the third equality.

Am I right?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Transpose of Grassmanian variables

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Transpose Grassmanian variables |
---|

I Relativistic hidden variable quantum mechanics? |

I Dirac-Delta Function, Different Integration Variable |

I Understanding Continuous Variable QKD |

B Inner product of functions of continuous variable |

B Non-deterministic Hidden variables that can't be described by math |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**