Travel time for a space ship at relativistic speeds

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating travel time for a spaceship accelerating at 1G to a top speed of 0.8c over a distance of 100 light years. Key equations include the Lorentz factor, which is approximately 1.66 at 0.8c, and hyperbolic functions for more accurate calculations during acceleration and deceleration phases. The subjective time experienced by passengers can be approximated using the Lorentz factor, but acceleration phases must be considered for shorter distances, such as 4.2 light years to Proxima Centauri. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding relativistic effects for realistic sci-fi narratives.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Lorentz factor in special relativity
  • Basic knowledge of hyperbolic functions (sinh, cosh, tanh)
  • Familiarity with concepts of acceleration and deceleration in physics
  • Knowledge of relativistic speeds (e.g., 0.8c, 0.99c)
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate the Lorentz factor for various speeds
  • Study hyperbolic functions and their applications in relativistic physics
  • Explore the effects of acceleration on time dilation in special relativity
  • Investigate advanced propulsion concepts for future spacecraft designs
USEFUL FOR

Science fiction writers, physicists, and anyone interested in the implications of relativistic travel and time dilation in narrative contexts.

lordl
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi

I'm writing a science fiction novel, and I'm trying to figure out how to make an approximation on the travel time of a hypothetical spaceship traveling at relativistic speeds. Given the following:

The spaceship is capable of accelerating at a constant 1G, until it reaches a top speed of 0.8c, after which it will travel at constant speed until beginning deceleration. Deceleration will also be at a constant 1G. For this instance, the travel distance is 100 light years, and the ship will start from a standstill, and should come to a complete stop at it's destination.

What I want to find out, is how long the journey will take from the viewpoint of the passengers, and how long it will take from the viewpoint of an outside observer.

I'd like to know which equations I'll need to use to make this calculations, preferably in a form that I can use to repeat the calculations given other acceleration rates, distances and top speeds. I do not need the results to be extremely precise, a reasonable approximation will do (if that matters).

Please note that I only have a basic understanding of physics and math, so I would appreciate if any answers are kept as simple as possible. Though an answer I may not understand is better than no answer :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like a homework exercise.

Strictly out of curiosity, why do you want to give the readers of your book all these technical details, especially about acceleration?

A ball park number you get by simply ignoring the acceleration parts. Calculate the Lorentz factor, you have 0.8c for the spaceship, do you know how to get the Lorentz factor from that? From there you can calculate the time it takes for the traveler, the time it takes for an outside observer is trivial if you ignore acceleration.
 
Last edited:
I suppose it does sound a bit like a homework question, but it's not, I finished school quite some time ago :)

I don't actually want to give the readers all the technical details, but I'd like to know them myself. The thing is that my book will follow a technological development where the propulsions systems of the spacecraft become more efficient over time, allowing for higher and higher top speeds. As I'm not to keen on the idea of FTL travel, my space ships will instead rely on time dilation to get the passengers to their destinations in a survivable timeframe. Accordingly, I need to know how much subjective time passes by for them at different speeds.

The lorentz factor is easy, at 0.8 c it should be about 1.66. Are you saying I can just ignore the acceleration and deceleration phases of the trip, and still get a good approximation of the subjective time? So that given a 100 light year distance, the trip would take about 75 years subjectively?
Or am I misunderstanding something?
 
It takes about a year for a spaceship with a proper acceleration of 1g to reach 0.8c. So on a 75 year during trip that is not that much.

But is 0.8c dramatic enough for your sci-fi scenario?
 
0.8c is just the beginning, so to speak. The idea is that later generation ships will have higher top speeds, perhaps up to about 0.99c and above (cue, drama). I haven't really decided on how far I'll take it yet, but I'd like to follow an incremental technological development.

I should add that 100 light years was just an arbitrary example. What if the ship was going to Proxima Centauri, about 4.2 light years away. Could I still make a good approximation of the subjective time on board the ship using only the Lorentz factor?
 
lordl said:
0.8c is just the beginning, so to speak. The idea is that later generation ships will have higher top speeds, perhaps up to about 0.99c and above (cue, drama). I haven't really decided on how far I'll take it yet, but I'd like to follow an incremental technological development.

I should add that 100 light years was just an arbitrary example. What if the ship was going to Proxima Centauri, about 4.2 light years away. Could I still make a good approximation of the subjective time on board the ship using only the Lorentz factor?
Well since the spaceship needs about 2 years to accelerate and decelerate it is no longer very accurate to ignore acceleration. To calculate time, velocity and distance during acceleration you need hyperbolic functions (e.g. sinh, cosh and tanh).
 
All right, thanks very much for your help!
 
The http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.html may help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
745