Traveling to Mars with plasma rockets

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Plasma-powered rockets have the potential to significantly reduce travel time to Mars by approximately 50%. However, concerns regarding low thrust and the challenges of deceleration for orbital insertion remain critical issues. The discussion highlights the necessity of using traditional rockets for human transport, with plans to send fuel to Mars in advance for the return journey. Aerobraking is mentioned as a possible solution for slowing down spacecraft upon arrival, although its effectiveness for crewed missions is debated.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of plasma propulsion technology
  • Familiarity with ion thrusters and their applications
  • Knowledge of orbital mechanics and deceleration techniques
  • Awareness of aerobraking principles and their limitations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of plasma propulsion systems
  • Learn about the design and operation of ion thrusters
  • Investigate aerobraking techniques and their feasibility for crewed missions
  • Explore the implications of the square-cube law on spacecraft design
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, space mission planners, and researchers interested in advanced propulsion technologies and human spaceflight to Mars.

Physics news on Phys.org
This look like an Ion drive which we already have put on a few satelites. The problem I see when you have low thrust is how do you slow down to get into orbit once you reach your destination? Unless you spend half the journy accelerating and half the journey stopping again.

What am I missing here, surely this just removes the problem of huge amounts of fuel required but not duration to get there and back.

In reality it will be a regular rockets that gets humans to Mars. Likely we will send the fuel required to get us back into Mars's orbit beforehand and refuel when we get there for the return journey.
 
The article doesn't even have a byline. Science journalism is in a sorry state (and Beth Daley, I'm looking at you). It is likely written by Dan Goebel, or at least he is the common thread in the citations.

Next, the article absolutely does not say what the OP claims it says. It says one could carry more payload. The OP has sent us on a wild goose chase. While more payload is a good thing, it's not what the OP said it was.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
The article doesn't even have a byline.
The author is Gary Li.
MikeeMiracle said:
This look like an Ion drive which we already have put on a few satelites. The problem I see when you have low thrust is how do you slow down to get into orbit once you reach your destination?
For Mars, at least, there is the possibility of aerobraking.
 
The Aerobraking is an interesting concept, I can see this slowing down a satelite sent to Mars. With the martian atmosphere being so thin though, I don't think this would work on a ship carrying people. Any ship capable of carrying people will need to do so for months on end to reach Mars, the amount of extra equipment needed to sustain human life for that duration will make the ship far bigger and heavier.
 
MikeeMiracle said:
The Aerobraking is an interesting concept, I can see this slowing down a satelite sent to Mars. With the martian atmosphere being so thin though, I don't think this would work on a ship carrying people. Any ship capable of carrying people will need to do so for months on end to reach Mars, the amount of extra equipment needed to sustain human life for that duration will make the ship far bigger and heavier.
You're right about such a ship being bigger and heavier. Especially interesting given the square-cube law. Yet, aerobraking is the plan of record for SpaceX.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
11K