Triangle Inequality Proof theorem

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Triangle Inequality Theorem, specifically the proof involving the expression a^2 + 2ab + b^2 ≤ |a|^2 + 2|a||b| + |b|^2. The question raised is about the validity of the inequality ab ≤ |a||b| and how to rigorously conclude this without relying on calculus, as it seems circular to use an inequality that depends on the theorem being proven. The intuitive understanding of the inequality is acknowledged, particularly when considering the signs of a and b. The conversation suggests that proving ab ≤ |a||b| can be approached by examining three cases based on the signs of a and b, aligning with the principles of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the need for a clear, logical foundation for the proof of the Triangle Inequality.
Howers
Messages
443
Reaction score
5
To make it clear, I understand the theorem and several proofs of this theorem but the most basic one is not making sense.

Thm: |a+b|<or=|a|+|b|

Proof:
(a+b)^2 = a^2+2ab+b^2 < or = |a|^2 + 2|a||b|+|b|^2 = (|a| + |b|)^2
Taking the square root of both sides and remember that |x|=square root of (x^2), we can prove that |a+b| < or = |a| + |b| (Triangle inequality)



MY QUESTION: Why can you say that a^2+2ab+b^2 < or = |a|^2 + 2|a||b|+|b|^2 is true? Intuitively, this makes sense because if a or b is negative then obviously their product will make the left side less. But using this logic, why not just say that the triangle inequality is likewise intuitevly obvious? Obviously if one is negative, their sum must be less. So my question is, how do you rigoursly conclude ab<or=|a||b|.
This is the Cauchy inequality, but because it requires calculus to prove it does not seem logical as calculus relies on this very inequality!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well trivially x2=|x|2 for all x. So to show that a^2+2ab+b^2 is less than or equal to |a|^2+2|a||b|+|b|^2, you really only need to show that ab is less than or equal to |a||b|, you will have three cases, both are positive, both are negative, or one of a and b is negative.
 
Cauchy-Schwarz does not require calculus to prove.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K