MHB Trigonometric function values of quadrantal angles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of 7 cot 270° + 4 csc 90°, highlighting confusion due to a domain error encountered on a calculator. It is clarified that tan(270°) is undefined, which leads to the error when attempting to compute cotangent. The suggestion is made to use the identity 7*cos(270°)/sin(270°) as an alternative method for calculation. Additionally, it is noted that a calculator may not be necessary for solving this problem. Understanding the properties of trigonometric functions at quadrantal angles is essential for resolving such issues.
bgb
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I can't seem to solve 7 cot 270° + 4 csc 90°
I don't know whether I'm entering something in my calculator wrong (could've sworn I was doing it right earlier) or if there just isn't an answer.

In my calculator, I enter 7/tan(270°)+4/sin(90°) and it gives me a domain error.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
bgb said:
I can't seem to solve 7 cot 270° + 4 csc 90°
I don't know whether I'm entering something in my calculator wrong (could've sworn I was doing it right earlier) or if there just isn't an answer.

In my calculator, I enter 7/tan(270°)+4/sin(90°) and it gives me a domain error.

The reason is because tan(270°) is undefined.

You really shouldn't need a calculator for this, but if you really do, try entering as 7*cos(270°)/sin(270°).
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top