Trip to Moon: Escape Earth's Gravity

  • Thread starter Thread starter trolling
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the necessary speed to escape Earth's gravity for a trip to the moon. The problem involves gravitational forces, energy conservation, and the dynamics of celestial bodies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the work-energy theorem and conservation of energy in the context of the problem. There are questions about the need to consider the moon's gravitational influence and how to properly set up the equations for potential and kinetic energy.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights into the energy conservation approach and the potential contributions of the moon's gravity. There is an ongoing exploration of different methods and interpretations, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of gravitational interactions and the assumptions regarding the initial conditions for the trip. The problem constraints and the specific requirements of the homework are acknowledged but not fully defined.

trolling
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You plan to take a trip to the moon. Since you do not have a traditional spaceship with rockets, you will need to leave the Earth with enough speed to make it to the moon. Some information that will help during this problem:
mass of Earth = 5.9742 x 10^24 kg
radius of Earth = 6.3781 x 10^6 m
mass of moon = 7.36 x 10^22 kg
radius of moon = 1.7374 x 10^6 m
distance from Earth to moon = 3.844 x 10^8 m (center to center)
G = 6.67428 x 10^-11 N-m2/kg2
1) On your first attempt you leave the surface of the Earth at v = 5534.0 m/s. How far from the center of the Earth will you get?

Homework Equations



Wnet = ΔKE
(G * M * m)((1/rf) - (1/ro)) = (m * v^2)/2, M = mass of Earth & m = mass of satellite
(G * M)((1/rf) - (1/ro)) = (v^2)/2

The Attempt at a Solution



ro = radius of Earth (?)

(rf^-1 - ro^-1) = (.5v^2)/(G * M)
rf^-1 = ((v^2)/(2G*M)) - (ro^-1)
rf = (((v^2)/(2GM)) - (ro^-1))^-1

I plugged in the corresponding values, but they seem to be wrong. I got 26022994.95 m.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ro = radius of Earth (?)

(rf^-1 - ro^-1) = (.5v^2)/(G * M)
rf^-1 = ((v^2)/(2G*M)) - (ro^-1)
rf = (((v^2)/(2GM)) - (ro^-1))^-1
I'm not sure I follow the reasoning behind these manipulations ... did you try to use conservation of energy?

Will you need to include the Moon's contribution?
 
Simon Bridge said:
I'm not sure I follow the reasoning behind these manipulations ... did you try to use conservation of energy?

Will you need to include the Moon's contribution?

I tried using the work-energy theorem (W = ΔKE) & applied it to the problem. I'm not too sure about using the moon; I was hoping someone would know about whether to use it or not.
 
The sum of the potential energy with respect to the Moon, the potential energy with respect to the Earth and the kinetic energy is constant.
 
I would be tempted to treat it as an orbital problem. Take advantage of the Earth's daily rotation to choose an optimal launch location and direction (thus decreasing your required Earth-relative launch speed). I think a pretty good first approximation would be to plan a Hohmann style orbit for maximum apogee vs energy required.

It might be worthwhile to determine the radial distance where the Moon's influence just equals the Earth's in terms of acceleration due to gravity -- if you can cross that line with the right Moon/Earth/ spacecraft geometry, you can 'fall' the rest of the way to the Moon.
 
What voko said - but I'd put it as "total kinetic energy + total potential energy = constant" ... you can work out the craft's potential energy due to the Earths gravity and due to the Moon's gravity and combine them for total potential energy. (The moon will help your spacecraft travel towards it.)

the "orbital problem" treatment gneill mentioned is how you'd actually go about it IRL ... but may be more than your course wants from you. The question seems to be interested only in the radial contributions - so you'd have to aim really really carefully to hit the moon.

gneill also talked about the radial distance where the Moon's influence is equal (and opposite) to the Earth's. This means you won't need to start out at the escape velocity from the surface of the Earth just to get to the Moon. If you arrange your initial kinetic energy to be just enough to get you there (IRL, you need just a bit more than that or it's 50:50) - the Moon will pull you the rest of the way in. I suspect this last bit is what the lesson is trying to get you to realize.
 
Use conservation of energy.
 
@Trolling: how did you get on so far?
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
30K
Replies
7
Views
2K