Trivial Question on Gamma Distribution Function

Click For Summary
When a random variable X follows a Gamma Distribution with parameters K and theta, adding a constant k results in a new variable Y that follows a generalized gamma distribution. The nature of the distribution remains unchanged, but the parameters adjust accordingly. Specifically, if Y is defined as Y = a + λX, the probability density function (pdf) transforms to account for the shift. The new distribution Y + k will follow a Gamma distribution with updated parameters, specifically Y + k ~ Γ(α, a + k, λ). This demonstrates how constants affect the parameters of the Gamma distribution while maintaining its overall structure.
I_am_learning
Messages
681
Reaction score
16
If a random variable X follows Gamma Distribution Function with parameters K and thita, what does (X+k) follow? if K is a constant.
I think, since adding the constant is just like shifting the origin, the nature of the curve remain unchanged. But what about its parameter?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let X be the standard gamma distribution with parameter \alpha. Then this has pdf

p_X(x)=\frac{1}{\Gamma (\alpha)}x^{\alpha-1} e^{-x}

for x>0. Then we define the generalized gamma distribution as Y=a+\lambda X. This has pdf

P_Y(x)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)\lambda^\alpha}(x-a)^{\alpha-1}e^{-(x-a)/\lambda}

if x>a. This is the \Gamma(\alpha,a,\lambda)-distribution. The standard gamma is \Gamma(\alpha,0,1). So to answer your question:

if Y\sim \Gamma(\alpha,a,\lambda), then Y+k\sim \Gamma(\alpha,a+k,\lambda).
 
Thank you for your kind help.
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
7K