Trouble setting up to prove unique factorization

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lants
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorization
lants
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
This lemma the book states, I can't make sense of it.

Lemma: If a,b[itex]\in[/itex] [itex]Z[/itex] and b > 0, there exist q,r [itex]\in[/itex] [itex]Z[/itex] such that a = qb + r with 0 [itex]\leq[/itex] r < b.

Proof: Consider the set of all integers of the form a-xb with x [itex]\in[/itex] [itex]Z[/itex]. This set includes positive elements. Let r = a - qb be the least nonnegative element in this set. We claim that 0[itex]\leq[/itex] r < b. If not, r = a - qb [itex]\geq[/itex] b and so 0[itex]\leq[/itex] a-(q+1)b<r, which contradicts the minimality of r.

Can someone help explain this to me? Why can't a = 3, and b = 8. Then no q,r could exist so that r is less than b, right?
 
Is this considered a textbook style question? Sorry, how can I move it? I just saw number theory and posted
 
What is wrong with [itex]a=3[/itex] and [itex]b=8[/itex]? Here you simply take [itex]q=0[/itex] and [itex]r=3[/itex] (there is no condition that says either q or r have to be nonzero) to get [itex]3=(0)(8) +3[/itex] and [itex]0\leq 3< 8[/itex] as required.
 
Wow I'm quitting now

thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K