Smooth Manifold Chart Lemma

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
cianfa72
Messages
3,011
Reaction score
313
TL;DR
About the proof of Lemma 1.35 - Smooth Manifold Chart Lemma in J. Lee book "Introduction to Smooth Manifolds"
I've a doubt regarding Lemma 1.35 (Smooth Manifold Chart Lemma) from J. Lee "Introduction to Smooth Manifolds"

Lemma 1.35 (Smooth Manifold Chart Lemma)

Let ##M## be a set, and suppose we are given a collection ##\{U_{\alpha} \}## of subsets of ##M## together with maps ##\varphi_{\alpha}: U_{\alpha} \to \mathbb R^n## such that the following properties are satisfied:
(i) For each ##\alpha, \varphi_{\alpha}## is a bijection between ##U_{\alpha}## and an open subset ##\varphi_{\alpha}(U_{\alpha}) \subseteq \mathbb R^n##.
(ii) For each ##\alpha## and ##\beta##, the sets ##\varphi_{\alpha}(U_{\alpha} \cap U_{\beta})## and are open in ##\mathbb R^n##.
(iii) Whenever ##U_{\alpha} \cap U_{\beta} \neq 0##, the map ##\varphi_{\beta} \circ \varphi_{\alpha}^{-1}: \varphi_{\alpha}(U_{\alpha} \cap U_{\beta}) \to \varphi_{\beta}(U_{\alpha} \cap U_{\beta}) ## is smoot.
(iv) Countably many of the sets ##U_{\alpha}## cover ##M##.
(v) Whenever ##p,q## are distinct points in ##M##, either there exists some ##U_{\alpha}## containing both ##p## and ##q## or there exist disjoint sets ##U_{\alpha},U_{\beta}## with ##p \in U_{\alpha}## and ##q \in U_{\beta}##.

Then ##M## has a unique smooth manifold structure such that each ##(U_{\alpha}, \varphi_{\alpha})## is a smooth chart.

The proof claims that Hausdorff property follows from v). However v) includes the case where both ##p## and ##q## are included in the same ##U_{\alpha}##, i.e. their neighborhoods are not disjoint though.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
My edition of Lee's Introduction to Smooth Manifolds (Springer, 2003) does not contain a Lemma 1.35; the lemma you cite appears as 1.23 (Smooth Manifold Construction Lemma).

[itex]\{U_\alpha\}[/itex] is neither the topology on [itex]M[/itex] nor a basis for it. The topology on [itex]M[/itex] is defined by the basis [tex]\bigcup_{\alpha}\{ \phi_\alpha^{-1}(V) : V\mbox{ open in $\mathbb{R}^n$}\}.[/tex] Note that this requires us to prove that each [itex]U_\alpha[/itex] is open in this topology.

Let [itex]p \in M[/itex] and [itex]q \in M[/itex] be distinct. If there does not exist [itex]\alpha[/itex] such that [itex]\{p, q\}\subset U_\alpha[/itex] then by (v) there exist disjoint open [itex]U_\alpha \ni p[/itex] and [itex]U_\beta \ni q[/itex] and we are done.
Otherwise, let [itex](U, \phi)[/itex] be the chart whose domain contains both [itex]p[/itex] and [itex]q[/itex]. If [itex]\phi(p) = \phi(q)[/itex] then [itex]p = q[/itex] by bijectivity of [itex]\phi[/itex], and if [itex]\phi(p) \neq \phi(q)[/itex] then (by Hausdorffness of [itex]\mathbb{R}^n[/itex]) there exist disjoint open [itex]V_p \subset \phi(U)[/itex] and [itex]V_q \subset \phi(U)[/itex] such that [itex]\phi(p) \in V_p[/itex] and [itex]\phi(q) \in V_q[/itex]. The preimages [itex]\phi^{-1}(V_p) \ni p[/itex] and [itex]\phi{-1}(V_q) \ni q[/itex] are then open and disjoint by bijectivity of [itex]\phi[/itex].

Note that if we did not have (v) then if there was no [itex]U_\alpha[/itex] containing both [itex]p[/itex] and [itex]q[/itex], we would not be able to conclude that [itex]p[/itex] and [itex]q[/itex] have disjoint open neighbourhoods.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cianfa72
pasmith said:
the lemma you cite appears as 1.23 (Smooth Manifold Construction Lemma).

[itex]\{U_\alpha\}[/itex] is neither the topology on [itex]M[/itex] nor a basis for it. The topology on [itex]M[/itex] is defined by the basis [tex]\bigcup_{\alpha}\{ \phi_\alpha^{-1}(V) : V\mbox{ open in $\mathbb{R}^n$}\}.[/tex] Note that this requires us to prove that each [itex]U_\alpha[/itex] is open in this topology.
Yes, from (i) ##\varphi_{\alpha}(U_{\alpha})## is open in ##\mathbb R^n##. Since ##\varphi## is bijective ##U_{\alpha} = \varphi_{\alpha}^{-1} \circ \varphi_{\alpha}(U_{\alpha})## hence it is open in the given topology by its definition.
 
Isn't all this obvious! If two points belong to the same ##U_\alpha##, since it is bijective to an open set of some ##\mathbb R^n## and the topology comes from that, they are separable!
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Office_Shredder, jbergman and cianfa72