Truncated Fourier transform and power spectral density

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of an oscillating signal over white noise, specifically how SNR scales with integration time (T). It is established that the SNR increases as T^{1/2} due to the noise increasing as T^{1/2} while the signal increases linearly with T. The participants utilize power spectral density (PSD) formalism and truncated Fourier transforms to analyze the relationship, concluding that the power spectral density at the oscillation frequency decreases linearly over time, while the noise variance in the frequency domain remains constant. The calculations confirm that SNR is proportional to A^2 T.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of signal processing concepts, specifically signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)
  • Familiarity with power spectral density (PSD) analysis
  • Knowledge of Fourier transforms, particularly truncated Fourier transforms
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating integrals and delta functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of signal-to-noise ratio in the context of oscillating signals and white noise
  • Learn about the implications of power spectral density in signal processing
  • Explore advanced Fourier transform techniques and their applications in signal analysis
  • Investigate the behavior of noise variance in different frequency domains
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, signal processing engineers, and students in electrical engineering or applied mathematics who are analyzing oscillating signals and their interaction with noise in various applications.

Mishra
Messages
53
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I am trying to find an expression for the signal-to-noise ratio of an oscillating signal on top some white noise. In particular I would like to know how the SNR scales with the integration time. It is well known that during some integration time ##T##, the SNR increases as ##T^{1/2}## (because the noise increases as ##T^{1/2}## and the signal increases at ##T##). I am trying to prove this with, my limited skills in maths, using the power spectral density formalism.

The integration time is ##T##. I assume some signal: ##x(t)=A \sin(2 \pi \omega_0 t)## on top of some white noise of power spectral density ##S##. I am guessing that I should compare the power spectral density of the noise vs signal:
$$P(f)=X(f)^2$$
where ##X(f)## is the truncated Fourier transform:
$$X(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{T}}\int_0 ^{T} x(t) e^{-i \omega t} dt$$
In the limit where ##T## is large, the integral is a Fourier tranform, yielding a delta function:
$$X(f)=\frac{A}{\sqrt{T}} \delta (\omega - \omega_0)$$
Ence:
$$P(f)=\frac{A^2}{ T } \delta (\omega - \omega_0)$$
$$P(f_0)=\frac{A^2}{ T }$$

Here I have that the power spectral density at the oscillation frequency decreases linearly in time. Can someone explain me where my misunderstanding is please ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mishra said:
the noise increases as T1/2
It can be that my memory is playing trick in my head but as I recall the white noise variance in frequency domain increases as ##T^3##. So, do you have any reference that states what you wrote there?
 
I think the issue is that you are playing fast and loose with delta functions. The integral is simple enough that you may as well just do it. If I do a simplified case of ##x(t) = A e^{i\omega_0 t}## and let t run from -T/2 to T/2, then
$$
X(\omega) = \frac{A}{\sqrt{T}} \int_{-T/2}^{T/2} dt \, e^{i(\omega_0-\omega)t} = A \sqrt{T} \left[\frac{\sin\left(\frac{1}{2} T (\omega-\omega_0) \right)}{\frac{1}{2} T (\omega-\omega_0)} \right]
$$
The term in square brackets is a very nice number when ##\omega\rightarrow\omega_0##.

jason
 
By the way, for the noise I get ##\langle |X(\omega)|^2 \rangle## to be independent of time, so the SNR ##\propto A^2 T##, as I would expect. You should do the calculation.

Jason
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K