1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Why is the Fourier transform of a sinusoid assumed as this?

  1. Jun 28, 2016 #1
    Hello everyone.

    I'm trying to better understand structured illumination microscopy and in the literature, I keep coming across bits of text like this.
    Source: http://www.optics.rochester.edu/workgroups/fienup/PUBLICATIONS/SAS_JOSAA09_PhShiftEstSupRes.pdf

    From Fourier analysis, if I take the Fourier transform ##X(f)## of a time-varying function ##x(t)## that is a cosine, I get a pair of delta functions (quick derivation below).
    \begin{align*}
    X(f) & = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x(t)\exp(-i2\pi f t)\; dt\\
    x(t) &= \cos(2 \pi f_0 t) = \frac{1}{2}\left[\exp(i2\pi f_0 t) + \exp(-i2\pi f_0 t)\right]\\
    X(f) &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2}\left[\exp(i2\pi f_0 t) + \exp(-i2\pi f_0 t)\right]\exp(-i2\pi f t)\; dt\\
    &= \frac{1}{2}[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \exp(i2\pi f_0 t)\exp(-i2\pi f t)\; dt + \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \exp(-i2\pi f_0 t)\exp(-i2\pi f t)\; dt\\
    &= \frac{1}{2}[\mathcal{F}\left\{\exp(i2\pi f_0 t)\right\} + \mathcal{F}\left\{\exp(-i2\pi f_0 t)\right\}]\\
    \mathcal{F}\left\{\exp(i2\pi f_0 t)\right\} &= \delta(f-f_0)\\
    \mathcal{F}\left\{\exp(-i2\pi f_0 t)\right\} &= \delta(f+f_0)\\
    \therefore X(f) &= \frac{1}{2}[\delta(f-f_0) + \delta(f+f_0)]
    \end{align*}
    But the paper says that I should be getting three impulses. One at the origin, and the two I have detailed above. Where does the one at the origin come from?

    My only hunch so far is it might have something to do with the fact that this derivation I just did was in 1D, and what they are describing is in 2D (a surface). Of course, the other minor difference is that they are describing spatial frequency and I am describing temporal frequency, but replacing ##t## with ##x## and ##f## with a scaled ##k## (spatial frequency) isn't a big deal.

    Any tips?
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2016
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 28, 2016 #2

    mathman

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    An aside: the argument for the exp function should have "i" in it. [itex]2\pi ift[/itex] etc.
     
  4. Jun 28, 2016 #3
    You're right. I will fix that.
     
  5. Jun 28, 2016 #4

    jasonRF

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The word "intensity" usually means the square of the signal - from a quick glance at the paper they are indeed considering the square. Look at equation (1) in the paper, and note
    [tex]
    \cos^2(x) = \frac{1}{2}(1 + \cos(2x))
    [/tex]
     
  6. Jun 28, 2016 #5
    That's exactly it. The "DC" term comes from the square-to-double-argument trigonometric identity. Got it. Thank you very much! The rest of it is straightforward. :)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Why is the Fourier transform of a sinusoid assumed as this?
  1. Fourier Transform (Replies: 2)

  2. Fourier transform? (Replies: 3)

  3. Fourier Transformations (Replies: 10)

  4. Fourier Transform (Replies: 5)

Loading...