Limit as x approaches a: (x+2)^5/3 - (a+2)^5/3 / (x-a) | Limit Laws

  • Thread starter Thread starter fishspawned
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Figure Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit as x approaches a of the expression [(x+2)^(5/3) - (a+2)^(5/3)] / (x-a) can be evaluated using limit laws without direct differentiation. The discussion highlights the challenges posed by the fractional exponent of 5/3, which complicates expansion. A suggested approach involves substituting y = x + 2 and using the limit transformation to simplify the expression to lim_{X→A}[(X^5 - A^5)/(X^3 - A^3)]. This method effectively resolves the 0/0 indeterminate form and leads to the correct limit result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limit laws in calculus
  • Familiarity with fractional exponents and their properties
  • Knowledge of polynomial expansion techniques
  • Basic concepts of derivatives and the chain rule
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of limit laws in calculus
  • Learn about polynomial expansion and the binomial theorem
  • Explore the chain rule and its implications for non-integer exponents
  • Practice solving limits involving indeterminate forms like 0/0
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on limits and derivatives, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to fractional powers and limit evaluation techniques.

fishspawned
Messages
66
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement



the limit x->a of [(x+2)^5/3 - (a+2)^5/3] / (x-a)

Homework Equations



limit laws

The Attempt at a Solution



CALCULUS%20CHAPTER%202%20TEST%2001%20Limits-8_zps15cgn22c.jpg
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does the formula in the third attempt remind you on something?
 
it looks like I'm trying to get a derivative. I am trying to do this without working using any derivatives and for some reason the power of 5/3 is completely messing with my head and i do not know how to proceed. i am still getting a 0/0 situation.
 
Well, differentiation seems to be the shortest way. Otherwise you probably will have to follow the paths the differentiating formulas are proven. The power ##\frac{1}{3}## is the difficulty here, for you cannot expand it easily. Why do you want to restrict yourself, once you already have the formula for the first derivative?
 
The restriction is due to the question is apparently brought up before any derivatives are introduced. So apparently this is do-able without using straight up differentiation. Yes, the 1/3 is killing me. and i have no idea how to approach it.
 
I've just looked up how ##\frac{d}{dx} x^{\alpha}=\alpha x^{\alpha-1}## is proven for non-integer values ##\alpha##.
It's done by the chain rule and ##x^\alpha = \exp(\alpha \ln x)##. Perhaps this might help and you may use properties of the exponential function. Another substitution ##y=x+2## should decrease writing work.
 
Set ##X=(x+2)^{1/3}## ##A=(a+2)^{1/3}## then the it becomes ##\lim_{X\rightarrow A}{\frac{X^5-A^5}{X^3-A^3}}## . Hope I am right here and this helps.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
DELTA:
this seems to take care of it - provided you know how to expand a sum of powers to a high level - had to look it up to be honest:

so revised sheet:
CALCULUS%20CHAPTER%202%20TEST%2001%20Limits-82_zpshpcpjng5.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and fresh_42
fishspawned said:
DELTA:
this seems to take care of it - provided you know how to expand a sum of powers to a high level - had to look it up to be honest:

so revised sheet:
CALCULUS%20CHAPTER%202%20TEST%2001%20Limits-82_zpshpcpjng5.jpg
Correct result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K