Proving Turan's Theorem (Dual Version) and its Implications for $ex(n, K_{p+1})$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter joypav
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dual Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dual version of Turan's Theorem, which establishes that for a graph \( G \) with \( n \) vertices and \( |E(T'(n,q))| \) edges, the independence number \( \alpha(G) \) is at least \( q \). It is concluded that if \( \alpha(G) = q \), then \( G \) is isomorphic to \( T'(n,q) \), defined as \( q \) disjoint cliques of nearly equal size. The theorem implies that \( ex(n, K_{p+1}) = |E(T(n,p))| \), and the proof demonstrates that if \( |E(G)| > |E(T(n,p))| \), then the size of the largest clique \( \omega(G) \) must be at least \( p+1 \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of graph theory concepts such as independence number and cliques.
  • Familiarity with Turan's Theorem and its implications.
  • Knowledge of graph notation, including \( ex(n, K_{p+1}) \) and \( |E(G)| \).
  • Basic proof techniques in combinatorial mathematics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the original Turan's Theorem and its applications in extremal graph theory.
  • Explore the properties of disjoint cliques and their role in graph structure.
  • Learn about the independence number \( \alpha(G) \) and its significance in graph analysis.
  • Investigate the relationship between edge counts and clique sizes in graph theory.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, graph theorists, and students studying combinatorial optimization who are interested in advanced graph properties and the implications of Turan's Theorem.

joypav
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
I have already proved that for a graph $G$ with $n$ vertices and $|E(T'(n,q))|$ edges, $\alpha (G) \geq q$. Additionally, if $\alpha (G) = q$ then it must be that $G \cong T'(n,q)$.

Apparently this is the "dual version" of Turan's Theorem. How does this theorem imply Turan's?

That $ex(n, K_{p+1}) = |E(T(n,p))|$

Where:

- $T'(n,q)$ : $q$ disjoint cliques with size as equal as possible
- $\alpha (G)$ : independence number of $G$
- $ex(n, K_{p+1})$ : max number of edges in an n-vertex graph with no $K_{p+1}$ subgraph
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For completeness, here is the proof I wrote.
I'm not sure it is correct! May be some mistakes in the details.

Known Theorem:
Define $T'(n,q)$ to be q disjoint cliques with sizes of vertex sets as equal as possible. Let G be a graph with n vertices and $|E(T'(n,q))|$ edges. Then,
$$\alpha (G) \geq q$$
and if $\alpha (G) = q$ then $G \cong T'(n,q)$.To prove Turan's theorem, it suffices to show that if $|E(G)|>|E(T(n,p))|$ then $\omega (G) \geq p+1$, (where $\omega (G)$ is the size of the largest clique in G).\\
Assume $|E(G)|>|E(T(n,p))|$ then $|E(\overline{G})| \leq |E(T'(n,p))|$. By the in class proof, $\alpha (\overline{G}) \geq p+1$.
Notice that $\omega(G) = \alpha(\overline{G})$. Then we have, $\omega(G) = \alpha(\overline{G}) \geq p+1$, completing the proof.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K