Turning radius of curved plane on an inclined plane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving a formula for the turning radius of skis during a carved turn on an inclined plane. The conventional formula, Side Cut Radius x Cos(Edge Angle), is deemed inadequate as it assumes a flat surface, which does not reflect real skiing conditions. The key insight is that the skier's weight distribution and the ski's interaction with the snow create a complex force dynamic that must be considered. The participant suggests incorporating a formula similar to tan = v² / g r for banked turns, while acknowledging the need to factor in friction for a comprehensive model.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles, particularly forces and motion.
  • Familiarity with the mechanics of skiing and ski design.
  • Knowledge of vector diagrams and their application in physics.
  • Basic grasp of trigonometric functions and their relevance in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of skiing, focusing on force balance during carved turns.
  • Explore advanced vector analysis in three-dimensional force applications.
  • Study the impact of weight distribution on ski performance and turning dynamics.
  • Investigate the role of friction in inclined plane motion and its effect on turning radius.
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, ski instructors, engineers in sports equipment design, and anyone interested in the mechanics of skiing performance.

karen_lorr
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Hi again.

I hope this is the right section to ask this question.

Not home work (I'm retired) but yet another mind game I'm playing (and still getting nowhere).

I have trying to work out the formula for how a ski will perform a carved turn.

I have looked at many (many Many) websites and they all seem (to me anyway) to have got it wrong, although it may be me who has it wrong.

All the website I can find give a ski turn as the Side Cut Radius x Cos(Edge Angle).

But surely this would only apply if a ski was running on a flat surface (inclined plane) at an angle with the skis edge. (Fig 1)

But in reality this will "never" happen (unless skiing in a straight line down a hill) as the ski will normally always be turning and dig into the snow and the force will be at 0' to the base of the ski. (Fig 2 and Fig 3)

I can't seem to upload the graphic I made with this. So here is the Hotmail/skidrive link to the graphic
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=907EBF936638CE55!120&authkey=!AOoxyzV1hMvNLD4&v=3&ithint=photo,jpg
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=907EBF936638CE55!120&authkey=!AOoxyzV1hMvNLD4&v=3&ithint=photo%2cjpg

Does anyone have any insights that would help me produce a formula?

Thanks

K
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
fresh_42 said:

Yes I have. This is just one of the many sites I've seen that seem to me to have got it wrong.

On that site there is a section called "Force Balance For Skier Going Around A Purely Carved Turn"
But that is looking at this as an inclinded plane whereas it's more in line with (for example) a car going round a steep racing track and being held up with the centripetal force (I think)

The ski will in fact be pressing against the side of a wall it digs itself into not simply sliding round a turn (I am looking at a carve here not a slide).
 
The main effect that causes skis to turn is the movement of the skier's weight. It is not equally distributed along the ski but concentrated on its second half. So changing the weight towards left and on the rear end will not only dig into the snow but also apply more downforce to the rear end than to the front end. This causes the lighter front end to follow the force applied to the point beneath the skier which tangent points to the left.
I would try to draw a vector diagram of three dimensional force vectors using the snows resistance beneath the skier while he digs into the snow as the main point of where the forces apply to. One evidence that this is the crucial point is the fact, that you need a greater angle to dig in the faster you ski.
E.g. it is completely different on a mogul slope where you turn on top by generating a rotation.
 
I'm sorry but that's not correct.

I am trying to introduce something like tan
theta.gif
= v 2 / g r (banked turn) - of course I have left out F (friction) but if I can include this it go a long way towards what I'm looking for
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
14K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K