Twin Paradox: Solving for Time Interval in Satellite Orbit | Special Relativity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a clock in a satellite orbiting Earth for 5400 seconds and seeks to determine the time interval difference between this clock and an identical clock on Earth after one year, applying concepts from special relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the speed of the satellite, with some suggesting it should be based on escape velocity while others argue that escape velocity is not relevant for an orbiting satellite. There are attempts to derive the satellite's velocity using gravitational and centripetal force equations, and questions arise about the necessary altitude for accurate calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and attempting to clarify the necessary parameters for calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of Taylor expansion for small velocities, but no consensus has been reached on the calculations or assumptions made.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of information regarding the altitude of the satellite, which complicates the calculation of its velocity. There is also mention of the potential limitations of calculators in approximating gamma for small velocities.

Benzoate
Messages
420
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A clock is placed in a satellite that orbits Earth for a period of 5400 seconds. By what time interval will this clock differ from an identical clock on Earth after 1 year(assume that special relativity applies.)

Homework Equations


v(escape velocity)=11186 m/s
possibly delta(t) = delta(t')/gamma
gamma =1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



First I converted 1 year => 31536000 s

after 1 year , the observers on the satelitte measured the new time of the sattilitte to be

t(new)= 31536000 seconds + 5400 seconds = 31541400 seconds

after 1 year , the observers measured the Earth notices that the velocity of the satelitte to approach the speed of light.

t'(new) = 31536000 seconds + 5400 seconds/gamma=31541400.000004

the time interval between the times measured on Earth and on the satelitte after 1 year = 31541400 seconds -31541400.000004=.000004 seconds

but the back of my books says 9.6 ms. Where did I go wrong ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the speed of the satellite?
 
Doc Al said:
What's the speed of the satellite?

It does explicity state the speed of the satellite in the problem . But I assumed the escape velocity for all objects leaving the Earth is about 11186 m/s , according to the list of physical constants in the appendix of my textbooks.
 
Benzoate said:
It does explicity state the speed of the satellite in the problem .
Does? Or does not? If not, you have to figure it out.
But I assumed the escape velocity for all objects leaving the Earth is about 11186 m/s , according to the list of physical constants in the appendix of my textbooks.
What's escape velocity have to do with it? It's orbiting the earth, not escaping.
 
Doc Al said:
Does? Or does not? If not, you have to figure it out.

What's escape velocity have to do with it? It's orbiting the earth, not escaping.

It doesn't. wouldn't the velocity be v=2*Pi*(R(earth))/1 year?
 
Benzoate said:
wouldn't the velocity be v=2*Pi*(R(earth))/1 year?
Only if its altitude is zero. Read this: Earth Orbits
 
Doc Al said:
Only if its altitude is zero. Read this: Earth Orbits

so then finding the velocity of the orbit would be pointless if we are not given the distance between the Earth and sattelite
 
Benzoate said:
so then finding the velocity of the orbit would be pointless if we are not given the distance between the Earth and sattelite

Set the gravitational force equal to centripetal force... ie:

GMm/r^2 = mv^2/r
GM/r^2 = v^2/r

using this equation and

v = 2pir/5400

You can solve for v... you have 2 equations 2 unknowns (v and r).
 
learningphysics said:
Set the gravitational force equal to centripetal force... ie:

GMm/r^2 = mv^2/r
GM/r^2 = v^2/r

using this equation and

v = 2pir/5400

You can solve for v... you have 2 equations 2 unknowns (v and r).

Isn't r just the sum of the Radius of the Earth + the altitude of the satelitte?
r=R(earth) + h
 
  • #10
Benzoate said:
Isn't r just the sum of the Radius of the Earth + the altitude of the satelitte?
r=R(earth) + h

Yes. But you don't know the altitude.
 
  • #11
learningphysics said:
Yes. But you don't know the altitude.

I understand how calculate the velocity but for some reason I came up with the same time interval
I'll take you through my calculations.
GM(earth)/r^2 = v^2/r => v=sqrt(G*M(earth)/r) = 2*Pi*r/T

G*M(earth)/r = 4*pi^2 *r^2 /(5400s)^2 => r^3 = ((5400s)^2/(4*pi^2))*(6.67e-11)*(5.97e24 kg) => r= 6650321.521 m

now I can find the velocity: v =2*pi*(6650321.521 m)/(5400 s) = 7738 m/s

1 year = 31536000 seconds as measured by the person on the satellite

the time measured by the observer on Earth is gamma*proper time = 31536000 seconds*(1/(sqrt(1-(7738 m)^2/c^2) =3153600seconds

so there is no time differences according to my calculations. What am I doing wrong ?
 
  • #12
Since the speed is so small compared to light speed, the time difference won't be much. You won't be able to find it by plugging the numbers directly into a (typical) calculator, since 1 minus a tiny number will show up as 1. Instead, use a Taylor expansion of gamma for small v/c to calculate the time difference.
 
  • #13
But are my equations and calculations are correct

You think a TI -83 or TI-89 would approximate gamma better than a mere scientific calculator?
 
  • #14
You work looks OK to me. I don't know anything about those calculators, but I doubt they'll do any different. Do the Taylor expansion--that's the easy way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
7K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K