MHB Two-tailed Test: Rejecting the Null at 0.05 Level of Significance

AI Thread Summary
In a two-tailed test with a test statistic value of 2, the probability P(T>2) is 0.03. At a 0.05 significance level, the critical value for each tail is 0.025. Since 0.03 is greater than 0.025, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. The discussion highlights the common confusion in interpreting two-tailed tests and the importance of correctly applying the significance level. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate statistical analysis.
elove
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
In a two-tailed test, the value of the test statistic is 2. If we know the test statistic follows a Student’s t- distribution with P
(T>2) = 0.03, then we have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance.

I want to say True but I think I'm overthinking the problem. Can anyone help me out?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The problem is, it's a two-tailed test. If you take $0.05$ as your significance level, then you'd need $0.025$ probability in each tail. But your $P$ value is $0.03>0.025$. Therefore, you do not have sufficient statistical evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
 
Yes! I get tripped up working backwards on problems. two-tailed - 0.05/2 = 0.025. I understand - thank you! I feel silly now on such a simple problem.
 

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Similar threads

MHB Left-Tailed Test Rejects Null Hypothesis at 0.05 Level
Replies
1
Views
1K
I How far and how close to p=0.05 for statistical significance?
Replies
24
Views
5K
MHB P-value: 0.0098Area of the critical region: 0.01Critical value(s): ±2.326
Replies
3
Views
12K
B Test of statistical significance
Replies
27
Views
2K
MHB Visualizing Data, Significance Level, T-test, Level of Measurement
Replies
2
Views
3K
B Statistical Errors, Type I and Type II
Replies
43
Views
4K
I Confidence Interval vs. One sided Hypothesis Test
Replies
2
Views
2K
B Chi-squared test stat choosing a critical value
Replies
5
Views
3K
Hypothesis test: Find the critical value of Z, Zc
Replies
1
Views
3K
MHB Testing the Assumption of Car Model's km/L Performance
Replies
3
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top