News TX Gov. Perry and What He Would Change in the Constitution

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheStatutoryApe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change
Click For Summary
Rick Perry has proposed several constitutional changes in his book "Fed Up!" that include abolishing lifetime tenure for federal judges, allowing Congress to override Supreme Court decisions, and repealing the federal income tax. He also advocates for ending the direct election of senators, requiring a balanced federal budget, defining marriage as between one man and one woman, and making abortion illegal nationwide. Critics argue that these proposals could undermine checks and balances, increase government power, and exacerbate social divides. Many view Perry's ideas as unrealistic and lacking a comprehensive understanding of governance. Overall, the discussion raises concerns about the implications of these amendments on American democracy and civil rights.
  • #61
WhoWee said:
The Black Panther voter intimidation case comes to mind...'

The various immigration battles can be cited - basically, the states claim they have the right to enforce immigration laws - even if the Federal Government chooses not to:
Whatever the result, the panel's decision is the first step on a long road: legal experts expect the case to reach the Supreme Court. It is unclear when the panel will rule.

The Justice Department lawsuit, filed in July, triggered opposition from Republicans but praise from civil rights groups"

Then the courts will decide. And whatever they finally decide will be the law until a future Court decides otherwise (or until the laws are changed according to a constitutional process.).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
SW VandeCarr said:
Afaik, Congress can authorize federalizing the National Guard and did so in 2005. I don't know if that's a standing authorization or if it must be renewed from time to time. "Normally" Guard units are under the control of the states. Clearly, National Guard troops are currently serving in the US military and therefore under the actual control of the Executive . Congress can delegate and recall authority to and from the Executive when that authority is not specified in Article II of the Constitution. Also, only Congress can authorize funding to the executive and can influence policy this way. However afaik, Congress does not directly administer any enforcement unit. I don't see how it could.

http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=170453

Article I, Section 8; Clause 15 tells what the grounds are for calling up the Guard.

Clause 15 provides that the Congress has three constitutional grounds for calling up the militia -- "to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrection and repel invasions." All three standards appear to be applicable only to the Territory of the United States.
http://www.arng.army.mil/aboutus/history/Pages/ConstitutionalCharteroftheGuard.aspx
I underscored the relevant bit. There are several more notes on that page regarding the law on the topic of the Guard.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 293 ·
10
Replies
293
Views
35K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
14K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
10K
  • · Replies 259 ·
9
Replies
259
Views
29K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K