Typesetting multi-line equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter DrClaude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Typesetting
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the proper typesetting of multi-line equations, specifically regarding the use of inequalities and equalities when the left-hand side (LHS) remains constant. Participants explore different formatting approaches and their implications for clarity and correctness.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether to treat the LHS as repeating in each line or to stack the equations in a single line format, raising concerns about clarity.
  • Another participant suggests that clarity is enhanced by repeating the LHS and using the approximately equals symbol in the last equation to avoid confusion.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of introducing the approximately equals symbol, as it may suggest that further approximations are being made.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of not writing anything that is incorrect and suggests that all formatting options are acceptable except for a specific line that they deem incorrect.
  • One participant expresses appreciation for the idea of assuming the reader has enough knowledge to follow the mathematical argument.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to typesetting multi-line equations, with no consensus reached on a single correct method. Some advocate for clarity through repetition of the LHS, while others support a more compact format.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential for confusion in the absence of repeated LHS and the implications of using approximately equals versus equals. The discussion does not resolve these issues definitively.

DrClaude
Mentor
Messages
8,478
Reaction score
5,697
I have a question on how to properly typeset a series of inequalities or approximate equalities when the LHS does not change. Take for example
<br /> f(x) = \sin(x) \\<br /> \quad \approx x - \frac{x^3}{3!} \\<br /> \quad = x - \frac{x^3}{6} <br />
What I did there is that I took it as if it was one long line,
<br /> f(x) = \sin(x) \approx x - \frac{x^3}{3!} = x - \frac{x^3}{6} <br />
that is split and stacked. Is this the correct way to do it? Or is it assumed that the LHS repeats, i.e.,
<br /> f(x) = \sin(x) \\<br /> f(x) \approx x - \frac{x^3}{3!} \\<br /> f(x) = x - \frac{x^3}{6} <br />
in which case the last line is incorrect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would for clarity use the aproximately equals in the last equation and repeat the LHS.

Why?

Because as you're composing your solution steps you might need to insert a step and by not explicitly typing the LHS for each line means confusion will set in especially if you're reviewing your work weeks or months later for a test.
 
jedishrfu said:
I would for clarity use the aproximately equals in the last equation and repeat the LHS.
What I don't like about your approach is that once you introduce a \approx, there are no more =, so that it is not obvious if additional approximations are made.

There is also a problem when the LHS is itself very long.
 
My basic "rules" would be
(1) never write anything that is actually wrong.
(2) assume the reader at least knows enough to follow the mathematical argument.

So in the OP, all the options are OK, except for the last line $$f(x) = x - \frac{x^3}{6}$$ which just plain wrong.

In a more complicated situation you might need to spell out a detail like "and since 3! = 6 we get" ...
 
AlephZero said:
(2) assume the reader at least knows enough to follow the mathematical argument.

I like that :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K