UK Plutonium Problem: Fast Reactor or MOx Plant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter koab1mjr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uk
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the UK’s decision regarding the management of its plutonium stocks, specifically debating the merits of utilizing fast reactors versus establishing a MOx plant. The scope includes technical, conceptual, and policy considerations related to nuclear energy and waste management.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a preference for fast reactors, citing the need for industry advancement and the dual benefit of power generation and plutonium disposal.
  • One participant suggests a specific approach of using two GEH fast reactors to manage plutonium while generating energy.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the rationale for disposing of plutonium, questioning whether it might be needed in the future and suggesting secure storage as an alternative.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit differing opinions on whether to pursue fast reactors or a MOx plant, with no consensus reached on the best approach to managing the UK's plutonium stocks.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully explored the implications of plutonium disposal versus storage, nor have they addressed the technical feasibility of the proposed solutions in detail.

koab1mjr
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
I was curious to know the PF communities opinion on the recent press the UK has been generating in its choice on retrying a MOx plant or dabbling with a Fast Reactor Tech


How would you all vote if you were in charge?


I am for fast reactors since the industry needs the push but I am biased as a young person in the field.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'd say they should go with the two pack of GEH Fast Reactors. Get rid of the plutonium and produce power while they're at it!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thermalne said:
I'd say they should go with the two pack of GEH Fast Reactors. Get rid of the plutonium and produce power while they're at it!

Why should we get rid of the plutonium (I assume weapon grade)? It was produced at horrendous expense. If we burn it now and then need it again (asteroid blasting?), we will need to make it again.

What's the problem with just storing it somewhere secure?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
5K