Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A Uncertainties in Poisson processes

  1. Jul 3, 2016 #1
    Good morning PF,

    I'm feeling a bit doubtful about this issue. I'm working with optical detectors and I have to characterize them in terms of quantum efficiency and other similar things. Now suppose my detector is, ideally, a single large pixel, which I illuminate for a specific time. Then I store the recorded Nphotons and repeat the procedure for 10k times! At each iteration, due to the randomness of the process I can get 100 counts in the first step, 102 at the second, 95, 87, 101, 106, ... an so on.
    I want to make an average of such 10k values, and that's fine. But how about the uncertainty associated with this repeated measure? I have two ways:
    1) computing the standard deviation using std-like function (Matlab)
    2) putting Navg as argument of the squared-root like in Poisson processes

    I'm really stucked in this situation.
    Hope someone could help me!
    Have a nice day
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 3, 2016 #2

    Simon Bridge

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    n data points from a poisson distribution are approximately normal for large n (standard deviation ##\sqrt{n}##.
    If you have small numbers, then the distributon is strongly skewed and you'll need median and quartiles or some other way to account for skewdness.
    So - if you have sufficiently large counts, you want option 2... though either should work.
     
  4. Jul 3, 2016 #3
    Thank you so much! it helped a lot :)
     
  5. Jul 5, 2016 #4

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    It's not clear what you are really asking or trying to characterize- Simon Bridge's response refers only to the noise associated with incoherent photons (thermal light or 'shot noise'), but you have other noise sources: dark current, amplifier noise.... Your measurement contains all of these noise sources, which are hopefully independent from each other. Hamamatsu has some very read-able references on this issue:

    http://www.hamamatsu.com/jp/en/community/optical_sensors/all_sensors/guide_to_detector_selection/index.html [Broken]
    http://www.hamamatsu.com/jp/en/community/optical_sensors/sipm/measuring_mppc/index.html [Broken]
    http://www.hamamatsu.com/jp/en/community/optical_sensors/all_sensors/index.html [Broken]
    http://www.hamamatsu.com/resources/pdf/ssd/e05_handbook_image_sensors.pdf
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2017
  6. Jul 9, 2016 #5
    Dear Andy,

    thank you for your answer. You're right, probably I went a bit faster.. in case of an ideal detector (so only shot noise-limited) and photons coming out from a fluorescent specimen, is Simon's reply still valid? In real life my detector is a camera based on Single Photon Avalanche Diodes, and the designers told me that the sensor is only shot noise-limited, since SPADs are able to produce mA range currents upon photo-detection, and thus there's not the need of gain steps like in other optical sensor..
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Uncertainties in Poisson processes
  1. Poissons ratio (Replies: 2)

  2. Poisson Ratio (Replies: 3)

Loading...