Kara386
- 204
- 2
For an unstable particle is it reasonable to take the uncertainty in energy as the energy it was created with? If so, why?
The discussion centers on the application of the uncertainty principle to unstable particles, specifically delta baryons. It is established that the energy associated with an unstable particle, such as a delta baryon produced at 12,300 MeV, is not solely determined by the energy at creation. The decay lifetime of particles like muons remains constant regardless of their creation energy, indicating that energy does not influence decay rates. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity regarding the definitions of "unstable particle" and the specific energy being referenced.
PREREQUISITESPhysicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the behavior of unstable particles and the implications of the uncertainty principle in particle physics.
Kara386 said:For an unstable particle is it reasonable to take the uncertainty in energy as the energy it was created with? If so, why?
Apologies, I didn't really consider those things! Ok, so to clarify:ZapperZ said:Your question is extremely puzzling. What "energy" are you talking about when you are referring to the "uncertainty in energy"?
Secondly, muons are created in many different ways at many different energies. Yet, they have the same decay lifetime. So if you think that a muon's decay is dependent on the energy that was used to create it, then this should already answer your question.
Thirdly, what do you mean by "unstable particle"? How "unstable" are we talking about here? A free neutron is unstable. Is this part of the particle that you want to know even though its lifetime is in minutes?
There are many "baggages" surrounding this question that you have not explained.
Zz.