Uncertainty Principle & Ground State of Harmonic Oscillator

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alejandrito29
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the uncertainty principle as it applies to the ground state of a harmonic oscillator, specifically addressing the relationship between energy uncertainty (ΔE) and frequency (f) versus angular frequency (ω). The participants clarify that ΔE is correctly expressed as ΔE = ħω/2, not ΔE = ħf/2. This distinction is crucial as it highlights that the energy of a harmonic oscillator cannot be zero, even at absolute zero temperature, due to the concept of zero-point energy. The implications of this principle are significant in understanding the behavior of physical systems like atoms in solids and gases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly the uncertainty principle.
  • Familiarity with harmonic oscillators and their energy states.
  • Knowledge of angular frequency (ω) and frequency (f) in quantum systems.
  • Basic mathematical skills to manipulate quantum equations and variances.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the concept of zero-point energy in quantum harmonic oscillators.
  • Learn about the implications of energy eigenstates in quantum systems.
  • Investigate the relationship between time and energy uncertainty in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, theoretical physicists, and researchers studying the behavior of quantum systems and harmonic oscillators.

alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
For the ground state of harmonic oscillator i have

\Delta p \Delta x =\frac{\hbar}{2}

why if i do

\frac{1}{F} \Delta p \Delta x \cdot F =\frac{\hbar}{2}

\Delta t \Delta E = \frac{\hbar}{2}

\Delta E = \frac{\hbar}{2} \frac{1}{\Delta t}

\Delta E = \frac{\hbar}{2} f

but my answer should be \Delta E = \frac{\hbar}{2} \omega ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The delta-terms are measurements of uncertainty.
i.e. ##\Delta E## represents the precision to which energy is measured.
 
Simon Bridge said:
The delta-terms are measurements of uncertainty.
i.e. ##\Delta E## represents the precision to which energy is measured.

ok, but ##<\Delta E^2>= <E^2>-<E>^2= (<p^2>/(2m) + 0.5 m \omega^2 <x^2> )^2- ( <p>^2/(2m)+ 0.5 m \omega^2 <x>^2 ) ^2##

##=E_0^2-0^2=E_0 ^2 \to \Delta E = E_0##

then, my aswer should be ##\Delta E= \hbar \omega /2##, and not ##\Delta E = \hbar f/2##
 
Last edited:
hosc18.gif


This is a very significant physical result because it tells us that the energy of a system described by a harmonic oscillator potential cannot have zero energy. Physical systems such as atoms in a solid lattice or in polyatomic molecules in a gas cannot have zero energy even at absolute zero temperature. The energy of the ground vibrational state is often referred to as "zero point vibration". The zero point energy is sufficient to prevent liquid helium-4 from freezing at atmospheric pressure, no matter how low the temperature.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/hosc4.html
 
ok, but my question is about the value of ##\Delta E##, i don't ask about ##E_0##

##\Delta E## is ##\hbar \omega /2## or ##\hbar f /2## ?
 
The mean deviation of energy in an energy eigenstate is obviously zero.
The manipulations you made in the original post are not correct, the deltas are not differences or infinitesimals
 
alejandrito29 said:
ok, but ##<\Delta E^2>= <E^2>-<E>^2= (<p^2>/(2m) + 0.5 m \omega^2 <x^2> )^2- ( <p>^2/(2m)+ 0.5 m \omega^2 <x>^2 ) ^2##
I think you are still very confused.

##\langle (\Delta E)^2\rangle## reads: "expectation of the variance of E", and you put it equal to the variance, which is an odd thing to say ... but I think you meant to write:

##(\Delta E)^2 = \langle E^2\rangle-\langle E\rangle^2## would be the definition of variance.

For an energy eigenstate ##\langle H\rangle = E_n##
You seem to want to work on the ground state:
##\cdots =E_0^2-0^2=E_0 ^2 \to \Delta E = E_0##

then, my aswer should be ##\Delta E= \hbar \omega /2##, and not ##\Delta E = \hbar f/2##
Who says that ##\Delta E = \hbar f/2## is correct?
Where are you getting these ideas from?

Checking:
For the ground state:

##(\Delta E)^2 = \langle E^2\rangle-\langle E\rangle^2 = \langle E^2\rangle-\langle E\rangle^2 = E_0^2-E_0^2=0\implies \Delta E = 0##

... which means that the energy eigenstates of the harmonic oscillator are infinitely thin
... the energy of the lowest eigenstate is exactly ##E_0## and so on.

(I think you missed out a term in your subtraction.)

Since ##\Delta t \propto 1/\Delta E##, this means that the lifetime of the state is infinitely uncertain. i.e. the state lasts forever.

It may be easier of you write the relations out as: $$\sigma_x\sigma_p\geq \frac{\hbar}{2},\; \sigma_E\sigma_t\geq \frac{\hbar}{2}$$

Or it may be that you are referring to something else - I can't really tell.
Please tell us where these ideas are coming from.

Meantime, the statistics of the harmonic oscillator are detailed in:
http://academic.reed.edu/physics/courses/P342.S10/Physics342/page1/files/Lecture.9.pdf
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K