Uncertainty Principle & Ground State of Harmonic Oscillator

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alejandrito29
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the uncertainty principle as it applies to the ground state of a harmonic oscillator, specifically focusing on the relationship between energy uncertainty (ΔE) and time uncertainty (Δt). Participants explore the implications of these relationships and the values of ΔE in different contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the uncertainty relation for the harmonic oscillator, suggesting that ΔE should equal ħω/2 rather than ħf/2.
  • Another participant clarifies that ΔE represents the precision of energy measurements, emphasizing the significance of the uncertainty terms.
  • A participant attempts to derive ΔE using the variance of energy, concluding that ΔE should equal E0, which they equate to ħω/2.
  • Some participants challenge the manipulations of uncertainty terms, arguing that the deltas do not represent differences or infinitesimals.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of the energy eigenstates having zero mean deviation, leading to the assertion that the energy eigenstates are infinitely thin.
  • Participants reference external sources to support their claims and clarify their arguments regarding the uncertainty principle.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct value of ΔE, with some asserting it should be ħω/2 while others suggest ħf/2. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct interpretation and application of the uncertainty principle in this context.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made regarding the delta terms and their interpretations. The discussion highlights potential misunderstandings in the application of variance and expectation values in quantum mechanics.

alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
For the ground state of harmonic oscillator i have

\Delta p \Delta x =\frac{\hbar}{2}

why if i do

\frac{1}{F} \Delta p \Delta x \cdot F =\frac{\hbar}{2}

\Delta t \Delta E = \frac{\hbar}{2}

\Delta E = \frac{\hbar}{2} \frac{1}{\Delta t}

\Delta E = \frac{\hbar}{2} f

but my answer should be \Delta E = \frac{\hbar}{2} \omega ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The delta-terms are measurements of uncertainty.
i.e. ##\Delta E## represents the precision to which energy is measured.
 
Simon Bridge said:
The delta-terms are measurements of uncertainty.
i.e. ##\Delta E## represents the precision to which energy is measured.

ok, but ##<\Delta E^2>= <E^2>-<E>^2= (<p^2>/(2m) + 0.5 m \omega^2 <x^2> )^2- ( <p>^2/(2m)+ 0.5 m \omega^2 <x>^2 ) ^2##

##=E_0^2-0^2=E_0 ^2 \to \Delta E = E_0##

then, my aswer should be ##\Delta E= \hbar \omega /2##, and not ##\Delta E = \hbar f/2##
 
Last edited:
hosc18.gif


This is a very significant physical result because it tells us that the energy of a system described by a harmonic oscillator potential cannot have zero energy. Physical systems such as atoms in a solid lattice or in polyatomic molecules in a gas cannot have zero energy even at absolute zero temperature. The energy of the ground vibrational state is often referred to as "zero point vibration". The zero point energy is sufficient to prevent liquid helium-4 from freezing at atmospheric pressure, no matter how low the temperature.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/hosc4.html
 
ok, but my question is about the value of ##\Delta E##, i don't ask about ##E_0##

##\Delta E## is ##\hbar \omega /2## or ##\hbar f /2## ?
 
The mean deviation of energy in an energy eigenstate is obviously zero.
The manipulations you made in the original post are not correct, the deltas are not differences or infinitesimals
 
alejandrito29 said:
ok, but ##<\Delta E^2>= <E^2>-<E>^2= (<p^2>/(2m) + 0.5 m \omega^2 <x^2> )^2- ( <p>^2/(2m)+ 0.5 m \omega^2 <x>^2 ) ^2##
I think you are still very confused.

##\langle (\Delta E)^2\rangle## reads: "expectation of the variance of E", and you put it equal to the variance, which is an odd thing to say ... but I think you meant to write:

##(\Delta E)^2 = \langle E^2\rangle-\langle E\rangle^2## would be the definition of variance.

For an energy eigenstate ##\langle H\rangle = E_n##
You seem to want to work on the ground state:
##\cdots =E_0^2-0^2=E_0 ^2 \to \Delta E = E_0##

then, my aswer should be ##\Delta E= \hbar \omega /2##, and not ##\Delta E = \hbar f/2##
Who says that ##\Delta E = \hbar f/2## is correct?
Where are you getting these ideas from?

Checking:
For the ground state:

##(\Delta E)^2 = \langle E^2\rangle-\langle E\rangle^2 = \langle E^2\rangle-\langle E\rangle^2 = E_0^2-E_0^2=0\implies \Delta E = 0##

... which means that the energy eigenstates of the harmonic oscillator are infinitely thin
... the energy of the lowest eigenstate is exactly ##E_0## and so on.

(I think you missed out a term in your subtraction.)

Since ##\Delta t \propto 1/\Delta E##, this means that the lifetime of the state is infinitely uncertain. i.e. the state lasts forever.

It may be easier of you write the relations out as: $$\sigma_x\sigma_p\geq \frac{\hbar}{2},\; \sigma_E\sigma_t\geq \frac{\hbar}{2}$$

Or it may be that you are referring to something else - I can't really tell.
Please tell us where these ideas are coming from.

Meantime, the statistics of the harmonic oscillator are detailed in:
http://academic.reed.edu/physics/courses/P342.S10/Physics342/page1/files/Lecture.9.pdf
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
950
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K