Uncertainty principle leads to superlumina ?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the apparent conflict between the uncertainty principle and the speed of light limit in relativistic physics. It establishes that while the uncertainty principle suggests a scenario where velocity could exceed the speed of light, the correct interpretation involves relativistic momentum, defined as p = mv/√(1 - v²/c²). This formulation ensures that as velocity approaches the speed of light, momentum approaches infinity, preventing any particle from exceeding light speed. The key takeaway is that the uncertainty principle does not imply superluminal speeds when relativistic effects are properly considered.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with relativistic momentum equations
  • Basic knowledge of special relativity
  • Concept of mass-energy equivalence
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about relativistic momentum and its derivation
  • Explore the concept of mass increase at relativistic speeds
  • Investigate the relationship between energy, mass, and velocity in special relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics and relativity, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of modern physics.

for_Higgs
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
According to the uncertainty principle Δp*Δx≥h/2pi,
now suppose we measure a particle in a very tiny area(if x is tiny enough),
s.t. Δp ≥ h/(2xpi) ≥ mc then v > c.
But in fact, the velocity can not be faster than light.
So how can we compromise these two statement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you perhaps thinking p = mv? The relativistic momentum is
$$p = \frac{mv}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}$$
in which v < c always.
 
for_Higgs said:
According to the uncertainty principle Δp*Δx≥h/2pi,
now suppose we measure a particle in a very tiny area(if x is tiny enough),
s.t. Δp ≥ h/(2xpi) ≥ mc then v > c.
But in fact, the velocity can not be faster than light.
So how can we compromise these two statement?

Hi for_Higgs, welcome to PF!

First, the equation gives you the uncertainty in the momentum, not the value of the momentum.

Second, for velocities close to the speed of light, the change in mass due to velocity has to be accounted for. You have to use the relativistic momentum, such that ##p \rightarrow \infty## is the same as ##v \rightarrow c##, so the particle never exceeds the speed of light. [Edit: jtbell beat me to it]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
833
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K