Uncertainty Principle: Theorem or Principle?

  • I
  • Thread starter facenian
  • Start date
  • #1
394
15

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hello, It's been puzzling for me to try to understand this issue. To begin with it is clear that there are basically two principles, the Position-Momentum uncertainty and the Time-Energy uncertainty. It is also clear that there are at least two different interpretations attached to both. One is easy to interpret and according to this interpretation they are rather theorems derived from the formalism. These interpretations are statistical and are given for intance in the books by Griffiths "Intro.. to QM" and by Weinberg "Lectures on QM" and as I said before this is pretty clear and presents no interpretative dificulties.
There are however other interpretations which are not statistical(and are not thoerems and look like real principles) and they refer to individual measurements, which by the way seem the be the original ones used by Bohr, Heisenberg, etc. and there seem not to be agreement for the interpretation of Time-Energy uncertainty.
My question is about the relevance that the original interpretation given by the founding fathers of QM have today since the discussions about interpretation are very messy(for instance lots of papers)
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Nugatory
Mentor
12,615
5,165
My question is about the relevance that the original interpretation given by the founding fathers of QM have today since the discussions about interpretation are very messy(for instance lots of papers)
The original formulation of both the time-energy and position-momentum uncertainty principles is pretty much obsolete. The principles are still valid, of course, but they are now understood to be special cases of a more general principle that follows directly from the modern mathematical formulation of QM.
 
  • #3
vanhees71
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
14,381
5,975
The energy-time uncertainty relation is special, because in QT time is not an observable but a parameter. For a very good discussion of this issue (also in relativistic context), see the first few pages of Landau&Lifshitz vol. IV.
 
  • #4
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,981
540
Any physical principle or law is either a theorem or an axiom, when looked at from a mathematical point of view. The so-called „uncertainty principle” is a theorem when formulated in terms of the fundamental concepts of the theory of Quantum Mechanics, i.e. states and observables.
 
Last edited:

Related Threads on Uncertainty Principle: Theorem or Principle?

  • Last Post
3
Replies
70
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
934
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
24
Views
3K
Top