Solving for Energy & Momentum in Physics Questions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving energy and momentum questions in physics, specifically regarding the diffraction limit and the kinetic energy of electrons. The first question involves determining the longest wavelength that can resolve points separated by 0.5 Angstroms, while the second question requires calculating the smallest kinetic energy of an electron to achieve this resolution. Key equations include E = hc/λ for photon energy and the de Broglie wavelength relation λ = h/p for electrons. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is clarified as unrelated to the measurement problem presented.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the de Broglie wavelength concept
  • Familiarity with the equations E = hc/λ and λ = h/p
  • Knowledge of the diffraction limit in classical optics
  • Basic principles of kinetic energy in relation to mass and velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Abbe limit for diffraction-limited systems
  • Study the relationship between kinetic energy and de Broglie wavelength for electrons
  • Explore the implications of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate classical optics and its applications in resolving power
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and researchers interested in quantum mechanics, optics, and the principles of energy and momentum in particle physics.

anto
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
1)for an object of size 0.5 Angstrom, what is the longest-wavelength photon with which it can be observed?
2)for the object of problem 1, what is the smallest-energy electron which can be used to make the measurement?
Relevant Equations
∆E∆t = h/4(phi)
∆p∆x = h/4(phi)
∆λ = (∆E/E)λ
for the first question, i thougth that 0,5 A is the answer?

for the second question:
i used the E =hc/λ to found the E. but i got a little confused which equations to find ∆E, since there's no ∆t. or should i search the momentum, then use the λ= h/p ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your title "Uncertainty principle -- Using photons vs. electrons to observe a very small object" is confusing since the HUP has absolutely nothing to do with how things are observed. That is, the HUP is in no way a measurement problem, it is a feature of reality.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics and weirdoguy
anto said:
for the second question:
i used the E =hc/λ to found the E. but i got a little confused which equations to find ∆E, since there's no ∆t. or should i search the momentum, then use the λ= h/p ?
Hi @anto. Welcome to PF.

As already noted by @phinds, the question has nothing to do with Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. It’s about applying the diffraction limit of ‘classical optics’.

Your answer to the first part is reasonable. You might want to add ‘the order of‘ or ‘approximately’ to your value. If you wanted a more precise value, you could use what is called the Abbe limit (e.g. see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction-limited_system#The_Abbe_diffraction_limit_for_a_microscope).

But the questions seems badly worded, I think the real questions are these:

Q1. What is the longest wavelength [of any type of wave] which can be used to resolve points separated by 0.5 Angstrom?

Q2 What is the smallest kinetic energy of an electron which can be used to achieve this resolution?
________________
You have answered Q1. For Q2, note that E = hc/λ is for photon energy, not the kinetic energy of an electron.

Q2 asks for the electron’s kinetic energy which makes the electron’s deBroglie wavelength equal to 0.5 Angstrom (or whatever your answer to Q1 is).

Can you work out a formula for the electron’s kinetic energy (E) in terms of it mass (m), its deBroglie wavelength (λ) and Planck’s constant (h)?

Edit - typo' corrected.
 
Last edited:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
761
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K