Graduate Uncommon Publications: Feynman & Sommer-Hipple

  • Thread starter Thread starter apostolosdt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Publications
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on notable publications characterized by their brevity, highlighting a paper by Sommer and Hipple from 1950 as potentially the shortest. It references a unique Feynman paper that consists of a single equation, sparking interest in other similarly concise works. A blog post is mentioned, showcasing Conway's extremely short mathematical paper, which contains only two words and a diagram. Additionally, a humorous mention of a math paper that proves a probable prime is composite through its factorization is included, along with a playful suggestion for an "eight ball" paper. The conversation emphasizes the fascination with unconventional, succinct academic writing.
apostolosdt
Messages
178
Reaction score
204
I read about the following publication, claiming to be the shortest ever:
Sommer, Thomas, and Hipple, Phys. Rev. 80, 487 (1950).
Screenshot 2023-01-20 at 19.23.28.png

It made me recall another unsual paper by Feynman, containing only a single equation in its main text:

Screenshot 2023-01-20 at 19.44.40.png


and I wonder whether other people can recall analogous, uncommon, publications.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That reminds me of the famous telegram exchange between two people.

query: ?

reply: !
 
There is a math paper where a probable prime is shown to be composite by publishing its factorization. The wholoe paper is xxxxxx = yyyyyy * zzzzzz,
 
I'm waiting for the eight ball paper where the proof is:

It is decidedly so.

Maybe Garrett Lisy could use it in his E8 paper someday.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
128
Views
34K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 89 ·
3
Replies
89
Views
13K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
28K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K