The discussion revolves around the ability to identify sexual orientation from facial photographs, specifically examining a study that suggests some individuals can discern whether someone is gay or straight based on their appearance. Participants explore the implications of this study, the concept of "gaydar," and the potential biases in selecting images for analysis.
Participants generally do not reach consensus on the reliability of identifying sexual orientation from photographs. There are multiple competing views regarding the existence and accuracy of "gaydar," as well as the implications of the study discussed.
Limitations include the potential bias in photo selection, the narrow focus on only two sexual orientations in the study, and the lack of consideration for the spectrum of sexual identities. Additionally, the discussion highlights the complexity of social signals and personal perceptions related to sexual orientation.
I've been assuming San Diego is "normal" in it's percentage, but it may not be. It could be it is attracting a larger gay population than most cities, becoming more like San Francisco. I don't know. I see openly gay couples where ever I go here but I only go where the coffee houses are.Illuminerdi said:I'm not sure what the official name of the neighborhood is, but everyone refers to it as "boy's town", but I don't think the numbers for Chicago are anywhere near 20%, when accounting for it.