I Uncovering the Mystery of Calorie Constants

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter barryj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants Mystery
barryj
Messages
856
Reaction score
51
When calculating calories of a food..
It is sort of well known that carbs have 4 cal/gram, protein has 4 cal/gram and fat has 9 cal/gram. I wanted to do an experiment to determine these constants 4,4,and 9

I looked at soup, peanut butter, and a protein mix to get the values from the labels per serving and the data is...

soup carb 13, prot 2, fat 2, calories 80 (78)
p butter carb 8, prot 7, fat 15, calories 190 (195)
mix carb 18, prot 2, fat 4, calories 110 (116)

Note: numbers in ( ) are calculated from the 4,4,9 values. These numbers are reasonably close to what was listed on the label

so I set up a matrix where a= cal/gram for carb, b = cal/gram for prot, and c = cal/gram for fat
The matrix is..

13a + 2b + 2c = 80
8a +7b +15c = 190
18a + 2b + 4c = 110

Solving I got a = 3.65, b = 10.391 really?, and c = 5.85 ?really.

My calculated values are not even close to what I expected, around 4,4,9

Does anybody know why this is?? I am really puzzled.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
barryj said:
so I set up a matrix where a= cal/gram for carb, b = cal/gram for prot, and c = cal/gram for fat
The matrix is..

13a + 2b + 2c = 80
8a +7b +15c = 190
18a + 2b + 4c = 110

Solving I got a = 3.65, b = 10.391 really?, and c = 5.85 ?really.

My calculated values are not even close to what I expected, around 4,4,9
In your matrix calculation, if you use the numbers you showed in parentheses (78, 195, 116), it comes out exactly as you would expect. This shouldn't be a surprise, as you used the values 4, 4, and 9 for the cal/g for carbs, protein, and fats. The seemingly relatively small change from (80, 190, 110) to (78, 195, 116) makes a fairly significant change in the solution, most notably on the value of your b variable (cal/g for protein).
Geometrically, you are working with three planes in space, and determining the point they have in common. By changing all three equations, even relatively slightly, you are changing the intersection point.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top