Undergraduate physics competitions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence and nature of undergraduate physics competitions, comparing them to established contests like the Putnam exam for mathematics. Participants explore whether similar Olympiad-type competitions exist for physics and the implications of such competitions on learning and research.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note the absence of formal undergraduate physics competitions akin to the Putnam exam, suggesting a need for such events.
  • One participant emphasizes that undergraduate education focuses more on original research and practical experience rather than competition, advocating for internships and lab work instead.
  • Another participant argues that competitions can enhance learning and problem-solving skills, asserting that they provide motivation and a competitive thrill that benefits students.
  • One participant mentions the CAP prize exam in Canada as an existing undergraduate contest.
  • Concerns are raised about the perception of competitions like the Putnam as merely games, questioning their educational value while acknowledging that high scorers often become successful physicists and mathematicians.
  • A participant discusses the nature of Putnam problems, suggesting that they often rely on basic concepts applied in clever ways, which may not reflect deep theoretical understanding but rather problem-solving skills.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the value and existence of undergraduate physics competitions. While some see a lack of such competitions, others highlight existing ones and debate their educational significance. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the necessity and impact of competitions in physics education.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying assumptions about the role of competitions in learning and the transition from high school to undergraduate physics education. There is also a lack of consensus on the educational value of competitions compared to traditional research experiences.

Caravan
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
At the high school level, there is the Physics Olympiad exam.

At the undergraduate level, there is the Putnam exam.

Are there any Olympiad-type, undergraduate physics competitions out there? Like the Putnam, except for physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not that I'm aware of. At this point, it's not a matter of just memorizing facts. Now you're expected to be thinking about doing something original, and many undergraduates do manage to work on original research with a professor. Your goal now should be 'real' physics, not physics as a game - try getting an internship or working in a lab. Some conferences give awards to undergrad researchers who do a good job, and you can try applying for scholarships and grants for graduate school.
 
This is the only one that I know of: https://ortvay.secureweb.elte.hu/" . Some big company should do something about that though, and start arranging some undergraduate competitions. It's not like they can't make hard enough undergrad problems, just like the IPhO has tough questions for high school pupils, there should be a competition with hard problems for undergrad students.

Competitions provide such a thrill. People with a competitive mentality end up studying hard for such competitions. They learn faster and become better physicists for it. There's no way getting around solving problems as a physicist, and the more you hone your skill, the better you become. Doing 'real' physics certainly does not exclude 'playing physics games', especially when you learn something useful from it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: poseidon721
eri said:
Not that I'm aware of. At this point, it's not a matter of just memorizing facts. Now you're expected to be thinking about doing something original, and many undergraduates do manage to work on original research with a professor. Your goal now should be 'real' physics, not physics as a game - try getting an internship or working in a lab. Some conferences give awards to undergrad researchers who do a good job, and you can try applying for scholarships and grants for graduate school.

I see what you are saying, but why does the Putnam exist, then? Why is it so popular, if it's just a mathematics game? Don't the high scorers go on to be some of the most productive physicists and mathematicians?
 
In Canada, they do have an undergraduate contest called the "CAP prize exam".
 
Caravan said:
I see what you are saying, but why does the Putnam exist, then? Why is it so popular, if it's just a mathematics game? Don't the high scorers go on to be some of the most productive physicists and mathematicians?

I think the putnam did start as a more or less friendly competition between Harvard and West Point or something. You seem surprised by the fact that many contestants do treat it as a game. The Putnam is less about learning undergraduate mathematics deeply and more about building exceptional problem solving skills at the undergraduate level.

Often the problems use basic facts in the nicest way possible. For instance, the recent competition had a difficult PDE problem. But the PDE given was essentially something like the transport equation, which is one of the simplest linear PDEs. The dea behind the transport equation is that a particular directional derivative of a sufficiently smooth function vanishes. So if you had not studied PDEs, you had to rely on problem solving experience from multivariable calculus. At some point you also had to know the most basic differential equation: f' = f to proceed. There is certainly nothing theoretically deep going on here, but if you're not experienced at solving hard problems, it's hard to make progress.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K