Understand Time Measurements After Big Bang

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rico_uk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the measurement of time in relation to the Big Bang, specifically questioning how we can define a second in such a context. Participants clarify that modern time is defined by the frequency of light, making it a constant reference point. The conversation also explores the philosophical implications of time as a coordinate system rather than a linear progression, suggesting that all moments exist simultaneously. This understanding challenges traditional perceptions of time and its relationship to our universe.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of time measurement concepts, specifically "shakes of light."
  • Familiarity with the Big Bang theory and its implications on cosmology.
  • Basic knowledge of coordinate systems in physics.
  • Awareness of philosophical discussions surrounding time and existence.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the definition and implications of "shakes of light" in time measurement.
  • Explore the philosophical ramifications of time as a coordinate system.
  • Study the relationship between time and space in modern physics.
  • Investigate the Big Bang theory and its impact on our understanding of time.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, philosophers, cosmologists, and anyone interested in the nature of time and its measurement in relation to the universe.

Rico_uk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. This probably isn't the right place for people like me to ask stuff like this but I've searched the internet and am finding it hard to get any answers so I thought I'd post here. If the measurement of time is something we do by counting predictable repetitions, and these can vary dependent on relative speed to other objects etc. etc., how can people make statements like, 'we know what happened 1 second after the Big Bang? Surely our measurements of one second has absolutely nothing to do with our universe at that point in 'time'. Thank you and I hope someone can explain this to me!
 
Space news on Phys.org
"Surely our measurements of one second has absolutely nothing to do with our universe at that point in 'time'."

Why not? Assuming I was there at the big bang and was sitting in some (very) shielded ship and watched my clock, what's wrong?

EDIT: Seconds in the modern world are defined as so many 'shakes' of a certain frequency of light.
 
Ok, if seconds is measured in 'shakes of light' then I guess that makes sense as light is always constant. Thanks for your help!
 
Time is a spatial dimension, just like space. The concept of "progression through time" really is a meaningless statement. Time is a coordinate system. You specify two positions in time. Each time position represents a defined set of coordinates for the space dimensions it represents. Draw a line between the two time positions and you have just drawn a timeline that defines how the defined spatial coordinates in space change from one time position to another time position. That's all time is. There's no direction. There's no "progress". Just an infinite series of change in spatial coordinates defined at infinite time points.

As an observer (that's us), our brains have to somehow interpret the series of change. Hard to do when when all time exists simultaneously just as all space exists simultaneously. Your birth, childhood, adulthood and death...exist at once. Our brains cope by assigning order to these individual time positions of our lives. And hence, this results in our interpretation of time as "progression" in a single direction in a timeline.

Of course, all this comes with significant philosophical ramifications of life, religion, consciousness and existence itself...which I won't get into at the moment.

WP
 
Our time is based how long it takes our planet go around the sun
Months, days, hours, and seconds. We compare this time to other things we see.
It is all a comparison.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
7K