Understanding 4-Momenta in Electromagnetism: Solutions and Formulas Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsforumsfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proton
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the concept of 4-momenta in the context of electromagnetism, specifically focusing on the relationships between 4-current density and 4-momentum in different reference frames. Participants are exploring the implications of Lorentz transformations and the invariance of 4-momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the form of the 4-current density and its representation in matrix form. There are questions regarding the transformation of 4-momentum between different frames and the relationship between frequencies of photons in those frames. Some participants are also questioning the assumptions made in their reasoning about the transformation properties of 4-vectors.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants providing insights into the transformation of 4-vectors and referencing external sources for clarification. However, there are disagreements and confusion regarding the application of the Lorentz factor and the nature of the transformations, indicating that further exploration is needed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the depth of their explorations. There is an emphasis on understanding rather than providing complete solutions, and some participants express uncertainty about their interpretations of the material.

physicsforumsfan
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I have a three part question:

Homework Statement



If A^(3)=(Ax,Ay,Az) is the three-vector potential, J^(3)=(Jx,Jy,Jz) is the three-vector current density, [itex]\varphi[/itex] is the scalar potential and p is the charge density, then the four-current density J is given by:

The Attempt at a Solution



I have read through literature and believe the answer is:

c=speed of light

J=(cp Jx Jy Jz) -> I am confused because can this answer be written transposed in a matrix and still be correct or is this answer only valid in the form:

J=(cp,Jx,Jy,Jz)?

Part 2

Homework Statement



A photon is produced in frame S with 4-momentum P=(E/c,p,0,0) and frequency f , where hf=pc=E, p is the magnitude of the 3-momentum and E is the energy. Frame S' is traveling at speed v in the direction of the positive x-axis of frame S. What is the relationship between the 4-momenta P and P in the two frames?

The Attempt at a Solution



Using invariance of 4-momentum, Squaring P' will yield:

P'^2= (γP)^2 where γ is Lorentz factor 1/√1-v^2/c^2

Thus sqrt answer is:

P' = P/√(1-v^2/c^2)

Is this correct?

Part 3

Homework Statement



In the previous question, what is the relationship between the frequencies f and f' of the photon in the two frames?

The Attempt at a Solution



Taking inverse of f', you get

f' = 1/(γf) = f*√(1-v^2/c^2) or is it take the square and then sqrt it to give:

f'= f/√(1-v^2/c^2)

That's it,

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

no reply?

Help?
 
Hi,

Looks like no reply, must be difficult questions...

Anyways, I just like to added that for part two:

[itex]\overline{P}[/itex]=γP

where P (NOT dashed) is the 4 momentum for frame S.

Now if anyone can agree with me on this, easier to read, equation.

Now for Part 3...

Anyone?
 
physforums said:

Homework Statement



A photon is produced in frame S with 4-momentum P=(E/c,p,0,0) and frequency f , where hf=pc=E, p is the magnitude of the 3-momentum and E is the energy. Frame S' is traveling at speed v in the direction of the positive x-axis of frame S. What is the relationship between the 4-momenta P and P in the two frames?

The Attempt at a Solution



Using invariance of 4-momentum, Squaring P' will yield:

P'^2= (γP)^2 where γ is Lorentz factor 1/√1-v^2/c^2

Thus sqrt answer is:

P' = P/√(1-v^2/c^2)

Is this correct?
No, it isn't. You made two logical errors. First, in the very first step, you assumed ##p'^\mu = \gamma p^\mu##, yet this is what you're claiming to deduce. You can't assume what you're trying to prove. Second, even if the first line were valid, the second one doesn't follow from it logically. Just because two vectors have the same norm, it doesn't mean the vectors are proportional to each other.

What you need to find out is how a four-vector transforms under a boost. This should be explained in your textbook.
 
vela said:
What you need to find out is how a four-vector transforms under a boost. This should be explained in your textbook.

Hi vela,

Thanks for replying. The lorentz boost (or the transformation) of any four vector is the lorentz matrix multiplied by the vector according the the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation#Transformation_of_other_physical_quantities.

Essentially, the article is saying what I am saying:

[itex]\overline{P}[/itex]= γP

These questions are basically warm up questions to more 'applied' ones so the proofs aren't necessary as their comprehension is seen in the more latter questions.

Does the rule apply similarly for the frequency of a proton (next part)?

Thanks
 
No, the article is not saying what you're saying. ##\gamma## is a scalar, not a matrix. As you noted,
$$\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}.$$ How are you getting that multiplying by ##\gamma## is the same as multiplying by a matrix?
 
vela said:
No, the article is not saying what you're saying. ##\gamma## is a scalar, not a matrix. As you noted,
$$\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2}}.$$ How are you getting that multiplying by ##\gamma## is the same as multiplying by a matrix?

Hi,

I just noticed by assumption which as you said, is incorrect. I am using the gamma factor because I know the answer involved is P multiplied by a form/shape of the gamma factor (ie. sqrt (1-(v/c)^2)).
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K