Understanding 6-31G in Molecules: N2

  • Thread starter Thread starter hiltac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecules
hiltac
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hello !

When we say that we use a 6-31G for a molecule (ex: N2), it is this number of gaussian (6+3+1) for both of the atoms or for each atom ?
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For each atom, obviously, as the gaussians are used to approximate the atomic orbitals of each atom.
 
And how can we explain to use a 6-31G basis set to study a molecule like H2 ? 6 gaussian for the 1s and what about the splitting in 3+1 ?
Thank you again
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top