Understanding a special combination

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter anigeo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combination
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the combinatorial identity nC0+nC1+nC2+.....+nCn=2^n, specifically focusing on the interpretation of the terms "acceptance" and "rejection" in the context of selecting subsets from a set of n objects. Participants explore the implications of these terms in relation to the proof of the identity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the significance of "rejection" in the context of the proof, seeking clarification on how it relates to the selection process.
  • Another participant suggests that the proof can be understood through the binomial theorem, indicating that expanding (a+b)^n and substituting a=b=1 yields the identity.
  • There is a reiteration that each object can be dealt with in two ways, labeled as "acceptance" or "rejection," but the reasoning behind limiting to these two options is questioned.
  • Some participants express confusion about how to justify the assertion that objects can only be dealt with in two ways, suggesting that if there were more options, a different expression would be needed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretation of "rejection" and its role in the proof. While some agree on the binary nature of the selection process, others challenge the reasoning behind this limitation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights a potential ambiguity in the terminology used to describe the selection process and the implications of accepting or rejecting objects. There is also an underlying assumption that the identity holds true under the conditions discussed.

anigeo
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
nC0+nC1+nC2+.....+nCn=2^n

in the analytic proof for this my books say that it is the total number of combinations of n different things taken at least 1 at a time.
they say that each object can be dealt in 2 ways, either it can be accepted or it can be rejected.
hence n objects can be dealt in 2^n ways.
but how in selection how does the question of rejection come?what is the significance of this rejection?please explain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't understand your question. However a simple proof of the equation is by means of the binomial theorem. Expand (a+b)n and then let a=b=1 and you will get the result.
 
mathman said:
I can't understand your question. However a simple proof of the equation is by means of the binomial theorem. Expand (a+b)n and then let a=b=1 and you will get the result.

the binomial proof is done.this is the analytic proof in which they say that every object of n objects can be dealt in 2 ways,s objects can be dealt with in 2^2 ways,3 in 2^3 ways.this includes an acceptance of the object or its rejection.acceptance or selection is all right.how does the question of rejection arise?
 
It looks to be a matter of wording. Since every object can be dealt with in either of two ways, the two ways may be labeled "acceptance" or "rejection".
 
that's the thing, u got it.but how can u say that it can be dealt in only 2 ways?
 
anigeo said:
that's the thing, u got it.but how can u say that it can be dealt in only 2 ways?
That's what it is to prove the particular equation. If it's more than two ways, you have a different expression.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K