Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This thread explores Barandes' microscopic theory of causality as presented in his pre-print "New Prospects for a Causally Local Formulation of Quantum Theory." The discussion focuses on the implications of Barandes' claims regarding causal locality in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to Bell's theorem, and seeks to understand the interpretation of entanglement within this framework.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about Barandes' assertion that his theory deflates Bell's theorem, questioning how he can claim a causally local hidden-variables formulation of quantum theory.
  • Barandes distinguishes between causal locality and Bell's local causality, which raises concerns about whether he is merely restating the no-signaling theorem.
  • There is a suggestion that Barandes' interpretation could lead to a fundamentally different understanding of the universe compared to general relativity.
  • One participant notes that Barandes does not translate "entanglement" into his new framework, implying that it remains an unresolved aspect of his theory.
  • Another participant proposes that Barandes' hidden variables differ from those in Bell's theorem, suggesting a violation of the assumption of "divisibility" into an objective beable.
  • Concerns are raised about the difficulty of explaining causal locality through a Bayesian network analogy as attempted by Barandes.
  • Some participants emphasize the need for an open-minded approach to understanding Barandes' principles rather than dismissing them outright.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach consensus, with multiple competing views regarding the implications of Barandes' theory and its relationship to established concepts in quantum mechanics and relativity. The discussion remains unresolved on several key points, particularly concerning the interpretation of entanglement and the validity of Barandes' claims about causal locality.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in understanding Barandes' framework, particularly regarding the translation of established quantum concepts into his proposed language. There are unresolved questions about the implications of his theory for existing interpretations of quantum mechanics and the foundational assumptions underlying Bell's theorem.

  • #361
RUTA said:
One problem with the QRP is that its heavy emphasis on the formalism obfuscates its beautiful discoveries. It's taken me months of working with it to see what it actually means physically. Finding Darrigol's paper (referenced in post #354) provided a nexus between what we figured out on our own and Brukner & Zeilinger's papers on Information Invariance & Continuity and Hardy's 2001 paper.
I hope to have a little more time to study the QRP in detail, as I find it very interesting.

RUTA said:
Anyway, thnx for helping me figure out Barandes' idea :-)
My pleasure! :smile:

Lucas.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
4K
  • · Replies 175 ·
6
Replies
175
Views
13K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • · Replies 710 ·
24
Replies
710
Views
45K
Replies
119
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
Replies
44
Views
6K