Understanding |\beta><\alpha| in Sakurai's Book

  • Thread starter Thread starter rasko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the outer product notation |\beta><\alpha| as presented in Sakurai's book, specifically on page 22. A participant attempts to derive the expression using the inner product but mistakenly equates the outer product with a scalar. The correct interpretation emphasizes that the left-hand side represents a matrix (operator), while the right-hand side yields a scalar due to the order of multiplication. The error lies in confusing the operations of inner and outer products in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics notation, specifically bra-ket notation.
  • Familiarity with linear algebra concepts, particularly matrix operations.
  • Knowledge of inner and outer products in vector spaces.
  • Basic understanding of the principles outlined in Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics".
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about matrix representations of quantum operators.
  • Explore the differences between inner and outer products in linear algebra.
  • Review examples of quantum mechanical operators in Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics".
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of bra-ket notation and matrix operations in quantum theory.

rasko
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
In Sakurai's book, page 22:

[tex]|\beta><\alpha| \doteq<br /> \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> <a^{(1)}|\beta><a^{(1)}|\alpha>^{*} & <a^{(1)}|\beta><a^{(2)}|\alpha>^{*} & \ldots \\<br /> <a^{(2)}|\beta><a^{(1)}|\alpha>^{*} & <a^{(2)}|\beta><a^{(2)}|\alpha>^{*} & \ldots \\<br /> \vdots & \vdots & \ddots <br /> \end{array} \right)[/tex]

How can people get it? Following is my idea:

[tex]|\beta><\alpha|\\= |\beta> (\sum_{a'}|a'><a'|)<\alpha|\\<br /> =\sum_{a'}(<a'|\beta>)(<\alpha|a'>) [STEP *][/tex]

then we get
[tex]\doteq(<a^{(1)}|\alpha>^{*}, <a^{(2)}|\alpha>^{*} ,\ldots)\cdot <br /> \left( \begin{array}{c}<br /> <a^{(1)}|\beta>\\<br /> <a^{(2)}|\beta>\\<br /> \vdots<br /> \end{array} \right)[/tex]

Is the STEP* right? I'm not sure if i have understood the ruls of ket and bra.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
STEP* is incorrect. The LHS is a matrix (operator) while the RHS is a number (a scalar). What you have actually calculated (your error is in not being careful with the order) is the inner product[itex]\langle \alpha | \beta \rangle = \sum_{a'} \langle \alpha | a' \rangle \langle a' | \beta \rangle[/itex].

For the outer product, you are (post)multiplying a row vector with a column vector (in that order). Reversing the order gives the inner product, a scalar.
 
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K