MHB Understanding Complex Geometric Sequences: A Revision Question

paul6865
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
need a hand with a revision question, I don't quite understand how to go about solving it question is attached below
View attachment 5916
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-08-25 at 4.55.45 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-08-25 at 4.55.45 PM.png
    23 KB · Views: 109
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi, and welcome to the forum!

According to the definition of $u_n$,
\[
u_4=(1+i)u_3=(1+i)^2u_2=(1+i)^3u_1=3(1+i)^3=-6+6i.
\]
In general, $u_n=3(1+i)^{n-1}$. From there
\[
v_n=u_nu_{n+k}=3(1+i)^{n-1}\cdot3(1+i)^{n+k-1}=9(1+i)^{2n+k-2}.
\]
In particular,
\[
v_{n+1}=9(1+i)^{2n+k}=(1+i)^2v_n
\]
which means that $v_n$ is also a geometric sequence.

Another way to show this is to note that $\dfrac{u_n}{u_{n-1}}=1+i$ for all $i$. Therefore
\[
\dfrac{v_n}{v_{n-1}}=\dfrac{u_nu_{n+k}}{u_{n-1}u_{n+k-1}}=
\dfrac{u_n}{u_{n-1}}\cdot\dfrac{u_{n+k}}{u_{n+k-1}}=(1+i)(1+i)=(1+i)^2.
\]
The ratio does not depend on $n$; therefore, $v_n$ is a geometric sequence.

To answer other questions, you need to know formulas for the sum of geometric sequences and other information, which you can find in Wikipedia.

Please also read the http://mathhelpboards.com/rules/, especially rules 8 and 11.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
3
Replies
108
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top