Arithmetic Series and Geometric Series

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a mathematical problem involving an increasing sequence of four positive numbers, where the first three form an arithmetic series and the last three form a geometric series. The participants explore the conditions and equations derived from the problem, seeking to determine the sum of the sequence while addressing potential ambiguities in the problem statement.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the problem and derives equations based on the definitions of arithmetic and geometric series, questioning the solvability of the problem.
  • Another participant suggests solving the problem in parametric form and emphasizes the importance of ensuring the terms are positive and increasing.
  • Several participants express uncertainty about the wording of the problem, questioning whether "series" was used correctly and suggesting it might refer to positive integers.
  • One participant proposes a method to express all terms in terms of a single variable and suggests eliminating one of the variables to simplify the equations.
  • There is a discussion about the correct interpretation of the term "series" versus "sequence," with some participants providing links to external resources for clarification.
  • Participants derive a formula for the sum of the sequence but acknowledge that they cannot reach a final answer, instead identifying ranges for the sum based on the derived conditions.
  • There is a consensus that the value of r must be constrained between 1 and 2 to ensure all terms remain positive.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for constraints on the variable r and the interpretation of the problem, but there are multiple competing views regarding the correct formulation and understanding of the problem statement. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the final solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential ambiguities in the problem text and the need for clarity in definitions. There is also an acknowledgment of the limitations in reaching a final answer due to the complexity of the relationships between the variables.

Biker
Messages
416
Reaction score
52
Here is a question that I have a problem with, It doesn't seem to have a solution:

An increasing sequence that is made of 4 positive numbers, The first three of it are arithmetic series. and the last three are geometric series. The last number minus the first number is equal to 30. Find the sum of this series.

So here is my steps:
Here is the arithmetic series: ##a-d , a, a+d##
The geometric one is: ## a , a+d, ar^2##

So first in order for 2nd one to be geometric series: ##a+d## must equal to ## ar##
We conclude from this that:
## d = a(r-1)##

and the question gave us an equation which is

##ar^2 - (a-d) = 30##

By putting the two equation in each other we get:

## a(r^2 + r - 2) = 30##

Now the sum of the whole sequence is just the sum of the arthmetic plus the last number:
## \text{Sum} = 3a + ar^2 ##
## \text{Sum} = a(r^2 + 3)##and everything pretty much stopped here, I need a third equation to complete this and I didn't find a way to substitute the whole thing is another thing that is solvable. So the question is: Is it solvable in the first place?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Solve it in parametric form, and use the information that the terms of the sequence are increasing and positive. You get a formula and a range for the sum.
 
ehild said:
Solve it in parametric form, and use the information that the terms of the sequence are increasing and positive. You get a formula and a range for the sum.

Could you give me a start? I had to look for the parametric form to understand what it is ( English isn't my main).
I concluded that r must be in this period ] 1 , 2 ]
So the sum has to be between 52.5 and infinity?

I didnt actually use the parametric form, I substituted the smallest value possible.
 
Last edited:
I also guess that something is missing from the problem text. Have you translated it? Series means the sum of a sequence, so I do not think it correct to speak about the first three numbers as arithmetic series. But I am not sure, my English is rather poor.
Is not it possible that the problem meant positive integers?
I would denote the numbers by a, b, c, d, and would use the equations 2b=a+c, c2=bd and d=30+a, and the condition 0<a<b<c<d. All terms of the sequence can be written in terms of a, and you can find some condition for a, so as the sequence is increasing.
You kept both a and r in the final answer. Eliminate one.
 
ehild said:
I also guess that something is missing from the problem text. Have you translated it? Series means the sum of a sequence, so I do not think it correct to speak about the first three numbers as arithmetic series. But I am not sure, my English is rather poor.
Is not it possible that the problem meant positive integers?
I would denote the numbers by a, b, c, d, and would use the equations 2b=a+c, c2=bd and d=30+a, and the condition 0<a<b<c<d. All terms of the sequence can be written in terms of a, and you can find some condition for a, so as the sequence is increasing.
You kept both a and r in the final answer. Eliminate one.
Series is a synonyms of sequence. I ensured the translation is correct
You can write it as one equation with substituting the 2nd equation above in the the third one
which will give you
## \text{Sum} = \frac{30(a^2 +3)}{r^2 + r - 2} ##

But we can't get to a final answer, However we got the values of the sum where this is true.. So is there is more of this or ? I don't think there is to be honest
 
If r is the quotient of the geometric progression, the sum is
Biker said:
Series is a synonyms of sequence.
No, it is the sum of a sequence( or progression) .http://www.purplemath.com/modules/series.htm
What was the the original text? In what language?
Google translate is wrong sometimes.
Biker said:
I ensured the translation is correct
You can write it as one equation with substituting the 2nd equation above in the the third one
which will give you
## \text{Sum} = \frac{30(a^2 +3)}{r^2 + r - 2} ##

But we can't get to a final answer, However we got the values of the sum where this is true.. So is there is more of this or ? I don't think there is to be honest

You meant ## \text{Sum} = \frac{30(r^2 +3)}{r^2 + r - 2} ##
Stating that r>1 is the quotient of the geometric sequence, the formula above is the solution of the problem.
 
ehild said:
If r is the quotient of the geometric progression, the sum is

No, it is the sum of a sequence( or progression) .http://www.purplemath.com/modules/series.htm
What was the the original text? In what language?
Google translate is wrong sometimes.

You meant ## \text{Sum} = \frac{30(r^2 +3)}{r^2 + r - 2} ##
Stating that r>1 is the quotient of the geometric sequence, the formula above is the solution of the problem.
Sorry, was in hurry. Yea I meant that.

I don't use google translate. I guess in mathematics, it means the sum because when I looked it up in the dictionary it said it is the synonym of sequence.
Anyway, we are not in an English course XDWe should state that ##1 < r < 2 ##. If not the first element of the sequence would be actually negative if ## r => 2##
 
Biker said:
We should state that ##1 < r < 2 ##. If not the first element of the sequence would be actually negative if ## r => 2##
Yes, that is right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K