Understanding demand and supply curves

  • Thread starter Thread starter dpa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves Supply
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the demand and supply curves represented by the equations QD = 5600 – 8P and QS = 500 + 4P. A key point raised is the confusion regarding the graph's representation, particularly the supply curve's y-intercept and the necessity of reflecting equations along the y=x line for accurate graphing. The participant highlights an inconsistency in the supply equation, suggesting it should be QS = 4P - 500 to align with economic principles. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the conventions used in economics for graphing these functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of demand and supply functions in economics
  • Familiarity with graphing linear equations
  • Knowledge of dependent and independent variables
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to graph demand and supply curves accurately
  • Study the concept of consumer and producer surplus in economics
  • Explore the implications of y-intercepts in supply and demand equations
  • Investigate the reflection of equations along the y=x line in graphing
USEFUL FOR

Students of economics, educators teaching introductory economics, and anyone interested in understanding the graphical representation of demand and supply curves.

dpa
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, I am having hardtime understanding this problem.
I have two functions:
QD = 5600 – 8P
QS = 500 + 4P

Why is the graph like the one attached and not the normal mathematical graph where supply curve starts from y=(0,-125)?
Do ignore the consumer surplus and producer surplus part. That is irrelevant.
How (and why) do we proceed in this way in our calculations?
 

Attachments

  • asdasd.PNG
    asdasd.PNG
    4.6 KB · Views: 696
Physics news on Phys.org
P is the dependent variable in the graph. Rearrange the two equations and it will make sense (or reflect the graph about y=x). This is the one really annoying thing about an introduction to economics, you just get used to it. They always consider quantity to be a function of price but interchange them when graphing.
 
Suppose I rearrange the equations,
then P=700-0.125QD [which is fine without reflection and same as QD=5600-QD]
But, next P=0.25QS-125 but the graph is for 0.25QS+125. Note the + and _ after QS. It works with reflection. but not normally. Is there a certain convention. I mean am I always supposed to reflect along y=x line for supply curve only?
But then suppose we had QS=-500+4P. Would its y-intercept be (0,-125)?
 
Sorry, I didn't notice that. Algebra is still algebra, somebody made an error. The supply curve graphed is not the equation given. My guess is that they intended QS=4P-500 because the equation as written makes no sense. It implies that a producer would be willing to offer a supply of 500 at a price of zero which is absurd. So your equation is wrong, the graph given does not match the equation given, and the graph given does not match the alternative equation that I provided. They clearly intended that the producer would not offer anything until the price hit 125 but they messed up the whole thing. You should point this out. You have not lost your mind. :)
 
alan2 said:
P is the dependent variable in the graph. Rearrange the two equations and it will make sense (or reflect the graph about y=x). This is the one really annoying thing about an introduction to economics, you just get used to it. They always consider quantity to be a function of price but interchange them when graphing.
Yeah, that is a little weird. But I find it's a useful convention when including the various cost curves (eg. marginal and average total cost) on the same graph as the demand curve, since cost is a function of quantity produced.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
27K
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
716
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K