Understanding Elastic Scattering in Electron-Electron Interactions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sokrates
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scattering
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nature of electron-electron interactions, specifically whether these interactions can be classified as elastic due to Coulombic repulsion. It is established that while the phases of the electrons may randomize, the momentum lost by one electron is compensated by the other, allowing them to maintain their initial wave vector under certain energy conditions. The analysis references the Hydrogen atom's 13.6 eV electrons and discusses the Q factor's relationship to energy levels, concluding that interactions become fully inelastic at approximately 500 keV and 10^-15 meters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solid-state and mesoscopic physics
  • Familiarity with Coulombic interactions in particle physics
  • Knowledge of the Q factor in electromagnetic theory
  • Basic principles of electron scattering and energy loss mechanisms
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of Coulombic repulsion in electron scattering
  • Investigate the Q factor and its significance in high-energy physics
  • Study the transition from elastic to inelastic scattering in particle interactions
  • Examine the behavior of electrons at energies approaching 500 keV
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in solid-state physics, particle physicists, and anyone studying electron interactions and scattering phenomena will benefit from this discussion.

sokrates
Messages
481
Reaction score
2
My emphasis is on the solid-state/mesoscopic physics and I have the following question:

Can the interaction of two electrons that scatter off one another due to Coulombic repulsion be considered elastic?

I know that the phases of the electrons will be randomized and I also sense that this will not reduce the tranmission (although the momenta will be randomized, the lost momentum will be picked up by the other electron) but I don't know whether I can assume that they are going to travel with their initial wave vector ( frequency)?

This is somewhat important for my research. Thanks for your responses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm going to try some dimensional reasoning on this and see where it goes. Correct me if I'm wrong...

When you talk about inelasticity in electron-electron scattering, I'm assuming you mean the losses to radiation. Let's start by looking at the Hydrogen atom, with its 13.6 eV electrons and it 1 Angstrom radius. I'm going to think of it as a Bohr atom with the planetary orbits...I know this is wrong but it let's me ballpark some figures.

The v-squared-over-r forces in the Hydrogen atom are similar to what you would have if you shot two 13.6-eV electrons at each other and collided them head-on. So the radiative losses for the scattering case should be similar to the radiation from one cycle of the Bohr atom. This comes to around one part in 10 000 000 of the total energy. (In e-m theory the reciprocal of this fraction is called the Q factor of the corresponding antenna.)

As you increase the energy, the Q factor goes down by what I have reasoned out is the 3/2 power of the energy. For example: four times the energy gives 1/4 the radius gives twice the velocity gives one-eighth the interaction time gives sixteen times the accelleration gives 256 times the power taken over 1/8 the interaction time gives 32 times the energy which implies one-eighth the Q factor. (The Q factor, remember, is the ratio of the energy-loss-per-cycle versus the total energy. Eight is related to four by the 3/2 power.

To go from a Q-factor of 10 000 000 down to unity, you therefore need an increase in energy by a factor of some 50 000 or so. That's the 3/2 power relation.

If you start from the scale of the Hydrogen atom and keep increasing the energy until the Q factor is reduced to unity, then you have basically ALL the energy of the electrons being radiated away in a single pass. That's when the collision becomes totally inelastic. It happens at an energy of around 500 keV and a proximity of around 10^-15 meters. These are pretty well-known numbers.
 
Thank you for the terrific response.
I have surely benefited from it, hope others would find it useful, too.

edit: (I think for my purposes the interaction could be considered fully elastic - since the energies are never greater than, say, 10 eV's in my field)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K