Understanding Faraday's Law: Coil in Magnetic Field

  • Thread starter Thread starter FourierX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Faraday's law Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on Faraday's Law of Electromagnetic Induction, specifically regarding a ring-shaped coil with N turns and area A connected to a circuit with resistance R. The key assertion is that the total charge Q flowing through the circuit, resulting from a change in magnetic flux from an initial value A to a final value B, is independent of the rate of change of flux (dΦ/dt). The participants clarify that the electromotive force (EMF) can be expressed as EMF = -N(B - A)/Δt, emphasizing that the charge Q is determined solely by the difference in magnetic flux, not the rate of change.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Faraday's Law of Electromagnetic Induction
  • Familiarity with concepts of magnetic flux and its calculation
  • Knowledge of Ohm's Law and circuit resistance
  • Basic principles of electromotive force (EMF)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Faraday's Law and its implications in electromagnetic systems
  • Learn about calculating magnetic flux for different coil configurations
  • Explore the relationship between EMF, current, and resistance in electrical circuits
  • Investigate practical applications of Faraday's Law in electrical engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding electromagnetic induction and its applications in circuits.

FourierX
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Actually this is not exactly a homework. I am trying to understand the following situation only.



Consider a ring shaped coil of N turns and area A. Connect it to an external circuit with a twisted pair of leads ( this info is trivial). The resistance of the circuit along with the coil itself is R. Now the coil in a magnetic field.

Suppose the flux through the coil is somehow altered from its initial steady state value (A) to final value (B).

The author claims that the total charge Q that flows through the circuit as a result is independent of the rate of change of the flux. I am having hard time understanding this. Can anyone help me understand it.



Homework Equations



\oint E.dl = -d\Phi/dt



The Attempt at a Solution



faraday's law is the most relevant law here, according to the book. But I am just not getting what the author is saying.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this lecture covers a lot of what you want to know.
http://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/8/8.02/videolectures/wl-802-lec16-220k.ram

(Requires Real Player, if that's not a problem for you.)

About 11 minutes in if you are in a rush.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks,

i followed the video. It was helpful.

However, i am still not sure about independence of charge with the rate of change of flux. On applying faraday's law

EMF = -Nd\Phi/dt

In the condition mention in the question above, B is the final M_flux A and the initial M_flux. We are trying to derive Q such that it is independent of d\Phi/dt.

I am confused with initial and final magentic flux. On just using d\Phi/dt, here is what i got

I = Nd\Phi cos(theta)/dt*(R)

and I = dQ/dt

But still Q is dependent on d\Phi/dt.

Any clue ?
 
Last edited:
What is cos theta here? And try equating the expression for I with V/R where V is as given by Faraday's law.
 
cosine theta is a mistake here. It has to be omitted.

Yeah, i did use Ohm's law there.

But my confusion at this point is, since the final and initial fluxes are given, in Faraday's formula, should emf beemf = -N d(B-A)/dt or just -N d(flux)/dt ?

The final expression is supposed to show that Q is independent of rate of change of flux
 
Last edited:
It should be emf = -\frac{B-A}{\delta t}.
 
did you forget N ?
 
No I didn't. N was already included in both B and A. Remember that B, A are themselves the flux through the coil. Anyway it should make no difference in the solution.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K