Understanding General Relativity: Gravity Warping Space-Time

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bobbyam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Weight
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
Bobbyam
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was an armchair student of physics some time ago, so I appreciate your patience with me. I was on a tour of the lost Atlantic Avenue tunnel in Brooklyn and I'm hoping someone can give me more insight, perhaps an analogy, to help me imagine this better. If I understood him right, this was mind blowing to me because for the first time I could glimpse actually understanding something of general relativity. The tour guide said that the heavier a locomotive is, the less energy is required to maintain its speed. This is because gravity is warping space time, like a bowling ball in a mattress, and the heavier locomotive, having more mass and more gravity, is actually "falling" through a space-time hole. Is this right? Can anyone add to it? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
None of that is true, or even vaguely accurate. Sorry.

Most blatantly, the overall premise doesn't make any sense: the more massive a locomotive is, the more energy is required to keep it going---even neglecting high order effects (i.e. the details of the wheels, engine, air-resistance, wheel-track interface, etc).

For instance: how much energy does it take to keep a model train going? Is that more or less than a full size locomotive?

Now, as far as the general relativity: any GR effects for a locomotive staying on the surface of Earth would be extremely negligible. Like, extremely, extremely. Even more importantly, if---for some reason---GR effects were important, they would still make it harder to maintain a given speed for a larger mass.
 
Bobbyam said:
Hi, I was an armchair student of physics some time ago, so I appreciate your patience with me. I was on a tour of the lost Atlantic Avenue tunnel in Brooklyn and I'm hoping someone can give me more insight, perhaps an analogy, to help me imagine this better. If I understood him right, this was mind blowing to me because for the first time I could glimpse actually understanding something of general relativity. The tour guide said that the heavier a locomotive is, the less energy is required to maintain its speed. This is because gravity is warping space time, like a bowling ball in a mattress, and the heavier locomotive, having more mass and more gravity, is actually "falling" through a space-time hole. Is this right? Can anyone add to it? Thank you.
So, not knowing the situation, is this locomotive going down in a tunnel or traveling flat in a tunnel?
 
It's supposedly on a perfectly flat grade.
 
Bobbyam said:
It's supposedly on a perfectly flat grade.
In that case I fully agree with zhermes