Understanding generating sets for free groups.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monobrow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Sets
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the proposition that if a free group F is generated by two sets U and V of equal cardinality, then V also freely generates F. Examples, such as F_2 = <a,b> = <a,ab>, suggest this might be true, as elements of U can be expressed uniquely in terms of V. However, the conversation highlights the need for careful consideration of technicalities in proving this proposition. It is noted that while finite generating sets of the same cardinality may be free, this does not hold for infinite sets, where not all generating sets are free. The conclusion emphasizes the complexity of establishing a formal proof for the proposition.
Monobrow
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I was thinking about the following proposition that I think should be true, but I can't pove:

Suppose that F is a group freely generated by a set U and that F is also generated by a set V with |U| = |V|. Then F is also freely generated by V.

This is something that I intuitively think must be true when considering examples I have come across e.g( F_2 = <a,b> = <a,ab> with {a,b} and {a,ab} both free generating sets). Does anyone know if this is true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess if F is generated by V, then you can write any element of U as a word in V in one and only one way.
So you can easily translate the word u1u2...un by translating all the ui separately and stitching it back together. It feels like you are right that this should lead to a formal proof, though you may need to take care of some of the technicalities.
 
note that if the numbr of generators is infinite then there are many generatin sets of the same cardinality but not all are free. Also a free set of elements of the same cardinality may not generate the whole group.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
497
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
825
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
850
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K