Understanding Green's Identity: Solving Laplace Equation for Harmonic Functions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
Harmonic function satisfies Laplace equation and have continuous 1st and 2nd partial derivatives. Laplace equation is [itex]\nabla^2 u=0[/itex].

Using Green's 1st identity:

[tex]\int_{\Omega} v \nabla^2 u \;+\; \nabla u \;\cdot \; \nabla v \; dx\;dy \;=\; \int_{\Gamma} v\frac{\partial u}{\partial n} \; ds[/tex]

[tex]v=1 \;\Rightarrow\; \int_{\Omega} \nabla^2 u \; dx\;dy \;=\; \int_{\Gamma} \frac{\partial u}{\partial n} \; ds = 0 \;\hbox { if } \;u \;\hbox{ is a harmonic function .}[/tex]

Why is it equal zero if u is harmonic function? Why is:

[tex]\int_{\Omega} \nabla^2 u \; dx\;dy =0 \hbox { if } \nabla^2 u =0[/tex]

Or more basic question:

What is [itex]\int_{\Gamma} 0 dxdy[/itex]? Is it not zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The integral of zero is zero. I don't see a problem here.
 
jackmell said:
The integral of zero is zero. I don't see a problem here.

Thanks

So you mean:

[tex]\int_{\Omega} \nabla^2 u \; dx\;dy =0 \hbox { if } \nabla^2 u =0[/tex]?
 
yungman said:
Thanks

So you mean:

[tex]\int_{\Omega} \nabla^2 u \; dx\;dy =0 \hbox { if } \nabla^2 u =0[/tex]?

Youngman, I don't want to get over my head with this or nothing, but let me try to explain since I jumped in: if the function u is harmonic, then the Laplacian is zero, not a limit which approaches zero but identically zero and surely the integral of zero is just zero.
 
jackmell said:
Youngman, I don't want to get over my head with this or nothing, but let me try to explain since I jumped in: if the function u is harmonic, then the Laplacian is zero, not a limit which approaches zero but identically zero and surely the integral of zero is just zero.

I was just thinking if you differentiate x twice you get zero, if integration is the reverse of differentiation, should integrating zero be something! I dug up books and I did not see anything about this, that's why I posted.

Thanks for the help.