I Understanding Holonomic Constraints: Common Questions and Answers

AI Thread Summary
Holonomic constraint equations are crucial for understanding the dynamics of a system with multiple particles. To ensure all constraints are accounted for, there is no universal rule, but a thorough analysis of the system's degrees of freedom can help. Independent holonomic constraints mean that no constraint can be expressed as a combination of others, which is essential for accurately describing the system. The uniqueness of holonomic constraints depends on the specific system; multiple expressions can represent the same constraint as long as they capture the same physical limitations. Understanding these concepts is vital for effectively applying holonomic constraints in physics and engineering contexts.
Ahmed1029
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
I've got a couple of questions concerning holonomic constraint equations:

1- Suppose I've got k holonomic constraint equations for n particles, how can I be sure those are all the ones there are and I didn't miss any? I mean, in a given situation, I can be pretty sure that I've got all, but is there a general rule about the number of constraint equations that are sufficient?

2- What does "independent holonomic constrains equatiins" mean? My book always insists they have to be independent. Does it simply mean none of them is a scalar multiple of the other?

3- Suppose I've got n holonomic constraint equatione that completely capture the constraint forces, are they unique?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Unsure what you mean by this. This obviously depends on the system you are trying to describe.

2) That none of the constraints can be deduced from the others. If the constraints are linear, then it means no constraint is a linear combination of the others, but constraints need not be linear.

3) No, not necessarily. Any other expression that captures the same constraint will do.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Ahmed1029
that's what I was looking for! thanks!
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Back
Top