Understanding Index Notation: Multiplying Vectors & Tensors

Click For Summary
Index notation is used to represent various mathematical quantities, where "a" indicates a scalar, "a_i" denotes a vector, and "a_ij" signifies a second-order tensor. The expression "a_i*e_ij*b_j" suggests a multiplication involving a vector, a matrix, and another vector, although this specific operation may not be valid due to dimensionality issues. Indexing serves to connect components that are related, such as matrix entries or sequences, but the indices alone do not dictate structure. The notation can also encompass a wide range of mathematical objects, including sequences and matrices. Understanding these conventions is crucial for working with tensors and applying the Einstein summation convention effectively.
womfalcs3
Messages
60
Reaction score
5
I have a general question about index notation.

For an arbitrary quantity, a,

"a" denotes a scalar quantity.
"a_i" denotes a vector.
"a_ij" denotes a 2nd-order tensor.

So, if I have something like "a_i*e_ij*b_j"

Would this be like multiplying an nx1 vector, an mxm matrix, and an Lx1 vector? It would not be a possible operation, but I'm wondering if that what it means when you multiply quantities like that.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Indexing is usually used when you have components that are closely related, like entries in a matrix or sequence, but the indeces themselves do not imply any particular structure.

(x_i) could refer to a vector, sequence, n-tuple, or just a list of disparate objects.

Similarly (a_{ij}) could be the entries of an m x n matrix or a doubly indexed sequence of sequences (commonly seen in diagonalizing proofs).

Provided the products are defined, one could have all sorts of indeces running around in a product.

--Elucidus
 
You could be looking at Tensor notation:

www.fm.vok.lth.se/Courses/MVK140/tensors.pdf[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That is known as the "Einstein summation convention" and should be denoting Cartesian Tensor Notation. Also if your subscripts are separated by a comma, that implys differentiation.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
725
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K